These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17311165)
21. Occupant kinematics of the Hybrid III, THOR-M, and postmortem human surrogates under various restraint conditions in full-scale frontal sled tests. Albert DL; Beeman SM; Kemper AR Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S50-S58. PubMed ID: 29584475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The influence of personal protection equipment, occupant body size, and restraint system on the frontal impact responses of Hybrid III ATDs in tactical vehicles. Zaseck LW; Orton NR; Gruber R; Rupp J; Scherer R; Reed M; Hu J Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):642-649. PubMed ID: 28095025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts. Viano DC Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Human occupants in low-speed frontal sled tests: effects of pre-impact bracing on chest compression, reaction forces, and subject acceleration. Kemper AR; Beeman SM; Madigan ML; Duma SM Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S141-50. PubMed ID: 25307379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Second-row occupant responses with and without intrusion in rear sled and crash tests. Parenteau CS; Viano DC; Burnett R Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 33289580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pretensioner loading to rear-seat occupants during static and dynamic testing. Bohman K; Fredriksson R Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S111-8. PubMed ID: 25307375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of Thoracic Response and Injury Risk Using the Hybrid III, THOR-M, and Post-Mortem Human Surrogates under Various Restraint Conditions in Full-Scale Frontal Sled Tests. Albert DL; Beeman SM; Kemper AR Stapp Car Crash J; 2018 Nov; 62():1-65. PubMed ID: 30608992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests. Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of pediatric ATD biofidelity as compared to child volunteers in low-speed far-side oblique and lateral impacts. Seacrist T; Locey CM; Mathews EA; Jones DL; Balasubramanian S; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S206-14. PubMed ID: 25307388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison between a child-size PMHS and the Hybrid III 6 YO in a sled frontal impact. Lopez-Valdes FJ; Forman J; Kent R; Bostrom O; Segui-Gomez M Ann Adv Automot Med; 2009 Oct; 53():237-46. PubMed ID: 20184847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes. Hu J; Reed MP; Rupp JD; Fischer K; Lange P; Adler A Stapp Car Crash J; 2017 Nov; 61():67-100. PubMed ID: 29394436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Scaling approach in predicting the seatbelt loading and kinematics of vulnerable occupants: How far can we go? Nie B; Forman JL; Joodaki H; Wu T; Kent RW Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():93-100. PubMed ID: 27586109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]