These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17311475)

  • 1. Temporal integration in face perception: evidence of configural processing of temporally separated face parts.
    Anaki D; Boyd J; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 17311475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face perception in high-functioning autistic adults: evidence for superior processing of face parts, not for a configural face-processing deficit.
    Lahaie A; Mottron L; Arguin M; Berthiaume C; Jemel B; Saumier D
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Jan; 20(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 16460220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Turning configural processing upside down: part and whole body postures.
    Reed CL; Stone VE; Grubb JD; McGoldrick JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 16478327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural correlates of temporal integration in face recognition: an fMRI study.
    Lee Y; Anaki D; Grady CL; Moscovitch M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1287-99. PubMed ID: 22414993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.
    Loffler G; Gordon GE; Wilkinson F; Goren D; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2287-97. PubMed ID: 15924942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?
    Richler JJ; Tanaka JW; Brown DD; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1356-68. PubMed ID: 18980400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1023-39. PubMed ID: 16846295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces.
    Rhodes G; Ewing L; Hayward WG; Maurer D; Mondloch CJ; Tanaka JW
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):717-28. PubMed ID: 19228441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioral and ERP measures of holistic face processing in a composite task.
    Letourneau SM; Mitchell TV
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 18336979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain potentials and integration of external and internal features into face representations.
    Olivares EI; Iglesias J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 18295921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.
    Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Wenger MJ; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):328-42. PubMed ID: 18315409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search.
    Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal characteristics of top-down modulations during working memory maintenance: an event-related potential study of the N170 component.
    Sreenivasan KK; Katz J; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1836-44. PubMed ID: 17958486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neuroanatomic basis of facial perception and variable facial discrimination ability: implications for orthodontics.
    Masella RS; Meister M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 17826596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.
    Cheung OS; Richler JJ; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1327-36. PubMed ID: 19045978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Better to take one long or two quick looks? Independent processing of evidence from discrete visual presentations.
    Schwarz W; Kühn S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1337-52. PubMed ID: 19045979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.