These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17311476)

  • 1. Object-intrinsic oddities draw early saccades.
    Becker MW; Pashler H; Lubin J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17311476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.
    Brockmole JR; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 16262483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes.
    Underwood G; Templeman E; Lamming L; Foulsham T
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 17222564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance.
    Foulsham T; Alan R; Kingstone A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2008-25. PubMed ID: 21647804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
    Brockmole JR; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Turning the world around: patterns in saccade direction vary with picture orientation.
    Foulsham T; Kingstone A; Underwood G
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1777-90. PubMed ID: 18599105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes.
    Castelhano MS; Heaven C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1283-97. PubMed ID: 20601710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priming of simple and complex scene layout: rapid function from the intermediate level.
    Sanocki T; Sulman N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):735-49. PubMed ID: 19485688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.
    Nuthmann A; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):20. PubMed ID: 20884595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shift and deviate: Saccades reveal that shifts of covert attention evoked by trained spatial stimuli are obligatory.
    Van der Stigchel S; Mills M; Dodd MD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1244-50. PubMed ID: 20601705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.
    Huettig F; Altmann GT
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B23-32. PubMed ID: 15833303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Has someone moved my plate? The immediate and persistent effects of object location changes on gaze allocation during natural scene viewing.
    Võ ML; Zwickel J; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1251-5. PubMed ID: 20601706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming.
    Morgan JL; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):428-42. PubMed ID: 15910129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features.
    Le Meur O; Le Callet P; Barba D
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(19):2483-98. PubMed ID: 17688904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes.
    Birmingham E; Bischof WF; Kingstone A
    Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2992-3000. PubMed ID: 19782100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movement control during scene viewing: immediate effects of scene luminance on fixation durations.
    Henderson JM; Nuthmann A; Luke SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):318-22. PubMed ID: 23276111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.
    Võ ML; Henderson JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1742-53. PubMed ID: 21607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.