167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17311483)
1. Visual search is postponed during the attentional blink until the system is suitably reconfigured.
Ghorashi SM; Smilek D; Di Lollo V
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 17311483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The "beam of darkness": spreading of the attentional blink within and between objects.
Conci M; Müller HJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1725-38. PubMed ID: 19933558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional changes during implicit learning: signal validity protects a target stimulus from the attentional blink.
Livesey EJ; Harris IM; Harris JA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):408-22. PubMed ID: 19271855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are spatial selection and identity extraction separable when attention is controlled endogenously?
Ghorashi S; Spalek TM; Enns JT; Di Lollo V
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 19633339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.
Nieuwenstein MR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):973-85. PubMed ID: 16846292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emotional priming of pop-out in visual search.
Lamy D; Amunts L; Bar-Haim Y
Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 18410189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finding the target in search tasks using detection, localization, and identification responses.
Dukewich KR; Klein RM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19271810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink.
Vachon F; Tremblay S; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):330-47. PubMed ID: 17469971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can intertrial effects of features and dimensions be explained by a single theory?
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1417-40. PubMed ID: 19045983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is pop-out visual search attentive or preattentive? Yes!
Lagroix HE; Di Lollo V; Spalek TM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):556-64. PubMed ID: 25706768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.
Pratt J; Arnott SR
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 17490594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.
Olivers CN; Meeter M
Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):836-63. PubMed ID: 18954206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Masking T1 difficulty: processing time and the attenional blink.
Visser TA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):285-97. PubMed ID: 17469969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing.
Olivers CN; Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual encoding efficiency in visual search.
Rauschenberger R; Yantis S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):116-31. PubMed ID: 16478320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies.
Geyer T; Shi Z; Müller HJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):515-32. PubMed ID: 20515186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions.
Proulx MJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17311478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How does target duration affect object substitution masking?
Gellatly A; Pilling M; Carter W; Guest D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
