These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks. Hübner R; Lehle C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control. Kawahara J; Kumada T; Di Lollo V Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):886-90. PubMed ID: 17328390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models. Morgan MJ; Ward RM; Castet E Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):347-70. PubMed ID: 9621843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual search and contextual cueing: differential effects in 10-year-old children and adults. Couperus JW; Hunt RH; Nelson CA; Thomas KM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):334-48. PubMed ID: 21264739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient? Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects. Hommuk K; Bachmann T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):648-60. PubMed ID: 19485683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Potter MC; Chun MM; Banks BS; Muckenhoupt M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jul; 24(4):979-92. PubMed ID: 9699304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Attentional blink deficits observed in dyslexia depend on task demands. Buchholz J; Aimola Davies A Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1292-302. PubMed ID: 17408718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search. Thomas LE; Lleras A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A re-examination of the impact of object processing on shifts of spatial attention. Visser TA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):688-94. PubMed ID: 21264707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set. Oriet C; Jolcoeur P J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1036-49. PubMed ID: 14585021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues. Gottlob LR Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy. Wong KF; Chen HC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]