These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17311487)

  • 1. Variability in stepping direction explains the veering behavior of blind walkers.
    Kallie CS; Schrater PR; Legge GE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):183-200. PubMed ID: 17311487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Veering re-visited: noise and posture cues in walking without sight.
    Millar S
    Perception; 1999; 28(6):765-80. PubMed ID: 10664770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of veering during gait in blind individuals.
    Kadowaki H; Takeda T; Noto M; Mori M; Suzuki A; Ujima K; Nakamura T
    Gait Posture; 2024 Mar; 109():183-188. PubMed ID: 38335771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Veering in women: inconsistency of forward and backward progression.
    Day HD; Goins VJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Oct; 85(2):587-96. PubMed ID: 9347548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferred step frequency minimizes veering during natural human walking.
    Uematsu A; Inoue K; Hobara H; Kobayashi H; Iwamoto Y; Hortobágyi T; Suzuki S
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Nov; 505(3):291-3. PubMed ID: 22051522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative research of tactual-kinaesthetic sensitivity and auditory localisation in three different groups of blind subjects and normals.
    Arik IA
    Int J Rehabil Res; 1979; 2(2):241-3. PubMed ID: 478742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of optic flow perception and egocentric coordinates on veering in Parkinson's disease.
    Davidsdottir S; Wagenaar R; Young D; Cronin-Golomb A
    Brain; 2008 Nov; 131(Pt 11):2882-93. PubMed ID: 18957454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Path completion after haptic exploration without vision: implications for haptic spatial representations.
    Klatzky RL
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Feb; 61(2):220-35. PubMed ID: 10089757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human side preferences in three different whole-body movement tasks.
    Mohr C; Brugger P; Bracha HS; Landis T; Viaud-Delmon I
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 May; 151(1-2):321-6. PubMed ID: 15084448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of distance and direction errors associated with forward, backward, and sideway walking in the context of blind navigation.
    Paquet N; Rainville C; Lajoie Y; Tremblay F
    Perception; 2007; 36(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 17564199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input.
    Van Doorn GH; Hohwy J; Symmons MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1539-51. PubMed ID: 22661281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Walking straight into circles.
    Souman JL; Frissen I; Sreenivasa MN; Ernst MO
    Curr Biol; 2009 Sep; 19(18):1538-42. PubMed ID: 19699093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpersonal synchronization during side by side treadmill walking is influenced by leg length differential and altered sensory feedback.
    Nessler JA; Gilliland SJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):772-85. PubMed ID: 19796834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception-action dissociations of a walkable Müller-Lyer configuration.
    Wraga M; Creem SH; Proffitt DR
    Psychol Sci; 2000 May; 11(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 11273410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of contextual cues in the haptic perception of orientations and the oblique effect.
    Luyat M; Moroni C; Gentaz E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):760-6. PubMed ID: 16447394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Path integration: effect of curved path complexity and sensory system on blindfolded walking.
    Koutakis P; Mukherjee M; Vallabhajosula S; Blanke DJ; Stergiou N
    Gait Posture; 2013 Feb; 37(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 22840893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seeing with sound? exploring different characteristics of a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device.
    Brown D; Macpherson T; Ward J
    Perception; 2011; 40(9):1120-35. PubMed ID: 22208131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability of lower extremity joint kinematics during backward walking in a virtual environment.
    Katsavelis D; Mukherjee M; Decker L; Stergiou N
    Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2010 Apr; 14(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 20346261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive load of navigating without vision when guided by virtual sound versus spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Marston JR; Giudice NA; Golledge RG; Loomis JM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17154771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.