122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17311572)
1. Pentacam pachometry: comparison with non-contact specular microscopy on the central cornea and inter-session repeatability on the peripheral cornea.
Lam A; Chen D
Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 17311572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Central corneal thickness measured with three optical devices and ultrasound pachometry.
González-Pérez J; González-Méijome JM; Rodríguez Ares MT; Parafita MA
Eye Contact Lens; 2011 Mar; 37(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 21301351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of corneal thickness measured using an Oculus Pentacam.
Miranda MA; Radhakrishnan H; O'Donnell C
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 19214132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Ultrasonographic Pachymetry in Diabetic Patients.
Altay Y; Balta O; Demirok G; Burcu A; Balta OB; Ornek F
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Feb; 42(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 27348734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pentacam vs SP3000P specular microscopy in measuring corneal thickness.
De Bernardo M; Borrelli M; Mariniello M; Lanza M; Rosa N
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25240777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of proparacaine on central corneal thickness values: an evaluation using noncontact specular microscopy and pentacam.
Lam AK; Chen D
Cornea; 2007 Jan; 26(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 17198014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Central and peripheral corneal pachymetry--standard evaluation with the Pentacam system].
Rüfer F; Schröder A; Arvani MK; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 15719315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability and inter-device agreement for three different methods of keratometry: Placido, Scheimpflug, and color LED corneal topography.
Hidalgo IR; Rozema JJ; Dhubhghaill SN; Zakaria N; Koppen C; Tassignon MJ
J Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 25751834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained with a new corneal topographer.
Mao X; Savini G; Zhuo Z; Feng Y; Zhang J; Wang Q; Chen H; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1561-9. PubMed ID: 23860010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained using a new corneal topographer OphthaTOP.
Huang J; Savini G; Chen H; Bao F; Li Y; Chen H; Lu W; Yu Y; Wang Q
PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e109414. PubMed ID: 25559203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices.
Anayol MA; Güler E; Yağci R; Şekeroğlu MA; Ylmazoğlu M; Trhş H; Kulak AE; Ylmazbaş P
Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 24763122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry.
de Sanctis U; Missolungi A; Mutani B; Richiardi L; Grignolo FM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):712-718. PubMed ID: 17869208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topographic paracentral corneal thickness with pentacam and orbscan: effect of acoustic factor.
González-Pérez J; González-Méijome JM; Rodríguez Ares MT; Parafita MA
Eye Contact Lens; 2011 Nov; 37(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 21983548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.
Tai LY; Khaw KW; Ng CM; Subrayan V
Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 23095499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam system on posterior corneal assessment in the normal human eye.
Chen D; Lam AK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 17321396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and repeatability of the Pentacam on corneal curvatures.
Chen D; Lam AK
Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Mar; 92(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 18983633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices.
Karadag R; Unluzeybek M; Cakici O; Kanra AY; Bayramlar H
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27723007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of keratometry with a novel Color-LED corneal topographer.
Klijn S; Reus NJ; Sicam VA
J Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 25884580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth.
Buehl W; Stojanac D; Sacu S; Drexler W; Findl O
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 141(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16386970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison and repeatability of keratometric and corneal power measurements obtained by Orbscan II, Pentacam, and Galilei corneal tomography systems.
Crawford AZ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 23540708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
