BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17312302)

  • 1. Screening program serves fraction of those eligible.
    Finkelstein JB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):270-1. PubMed ID: 17312302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stat bite: Cancer screening for women.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):271. PubMed ID: 17312303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health insurance and cancer screening among women.
    Makuc DM; Freid VM; Parsons PE
    Adv Data; 1994 Aug; (254):1-12. PubMed ID: 10138738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the right cancer screening rate?
    Harris R
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 May; 132(9):732-4. PubMed ID: 10787367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relative economics of screening for colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer.
    Gyrd-Hansen D
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 1999 Nov; 32(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 10612013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of state-specific Medicaid reimbursement and eligibility policies on receipt of cancer screening.
    Halpern MT; Romaire MA; Haber SG; Tangka FK; Sabatino SA; Howard DH
    Cancer; 2014 Oct; 120(19):3016-24. PubMed ID: 25154930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracking cancer screening progress.
    Hanson K; Bondurant E
    NCSL Legisbrief; 2009 Mar; 17(17):1-2. PubMed ID: 19301481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, October 31, 1991-September 30, 1993.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1994 Jul; 43(29):530-4. PubMed ID: 8028574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should we abandon pap smear testing?
    DeMay RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S48-51. PubMed ID: 11996169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Access to cancer screening services for women.
    Kirkman-Liff B; Kronenfeld JJ
    Am J Public Health; 1992 May; 82(5):733-5. PubMed ID: 1566955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concerning the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):269. PubMed ID: 9648811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Costs and problems in cervix cancer screening are considerably underestimated].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3506-8. PubMed ID: 11037597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social epidemiology and the fundamental cause concept: on the structuring of effective cancer screens by socioeconomic status.
    Link BG; Northridge ME; Phelan JC; Ganz ML
    Milbank Q; 1998; 76(3):375-402, 304-5. PubMed ID: 9738168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preventive care for low-income women in massachusetts post-health reform.
    Clark CR; Soukup J; Riden H; Tovar D; Orton P; Burdick E; Capistran ME; Morisset J; Browne EE; Fitzmaurice G; Johnson PA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 Jun; 23(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 24798240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Methods to increase participation in cancer screening programmes].
    Giorgi Rossi P; Camilloni L; Cogo C; Federici A; Ferroni E; Furnari G; Giordano L; Grazzini G; Iossa A; Jimenez B; Palazzi M; Palazzo F; Spadea T; Senore C; Borgia P; Guasticchi G
    Epidemiol Prev; 2012 Jan; 36(1 Suppl 1):1-104. PubMed ID: 22418841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Criticism of mass screening for breast cancer and cervix cancer].
    Zahl PH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Nov; 120(29):3602. PubMed ID: 11188395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of breast and cervical cancer screening at three public health centers in an inner-city urban area.
    Whitman S; Ansell D; Lacey L; Chen EH; Ebie N; Dell J; Phillips CW
    Am J Public Health; 1991 Dec; 81(12):1651-3. PubMed ID: 1746666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.
    Katz SJ; Hofer TP
    JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):530-4. PubMed ID: 8046807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.