441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17312596)
1. Settlements between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies: a reasonable antitrust analysis of reverse payments.
Yvon AM
Fordham Law Rev; 2006 Dec; 75(3):1883-912. PubMed ID: 17312596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Branded drug reformulation: the next brand vs. generic antitrust battleground.
Amoresano GV
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 17444032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pharmaceutical patent settlements: the antitrust risks.
Balto DA
Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):321-41. PubMed ID: 11824464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The "reverse payment paradox": an overview of the legality of reverse exclusionary payments in the pharmaceutical industry.
Brockmeier MS
Health Care Law Mon; 2010 Mar; 2010(3):2-10. PubMed ID: 20329564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reanalyzing reverse payment settlements: a solution to the patentee's dilemma.
Wang Z
Cornell Law Rev; 2014 Jul; 99(5):1227-58. PubMed ID: 25112001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Brand-name drug manufacturers risk antitrust violations by slowing generic production through patent layering.
Paine CS
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 12715807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Eleventh Circuit holds that agreements in which pharmaceutical companies pay generic companies not to compete may be valid.
Garrigues A
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 15152443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.
Carrier MA
Mich Law Rev; 2009 Oct; 108(1):37-80. PubMed ID: 20535881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are reverse payments and pay-for-delay settlements business as usual or an anticompetitive practice?
Shah S; Silva MA; Malloy MJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 34(7):716-9. PubMed ID: 27404880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The wake of FTC v. Actavis: practical implications on the pharmaceutical industry.
Ritter M; Tempesta J; Ragusa P
Pharm Pat Anal; 2014 Jul; 3(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 25291307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices: Business Practices.
Steiner DJ;
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2016 Dec; 2016():1-38. PubMed ID: 28252886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Delaying generic competition--corporate payoffs and the future of Plavix.
Shuchman M
N Engl J Med; 2006 Sep; 355(13):1297-300. PubMed ID: 17005945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: business practices.
Steiner DJ
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2013 Dec; ():1-36. PubMed ID: 24482889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On access and accountability--two Supreme Court rulings on generic drugs.
Boumil MM; Curfman GD
N Engl J Med; 2013 Aug; 369(8):696-7. PubMed ID: 23923990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Competition and antitrust enforcement in the changing pharmaceutical marketplace.
Whitener MD
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 10342998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Antitrust issues in the settlement of pharmaceutical patent disputes, Part II.
Leary TB
J Health Law; 2001; 34(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 11833411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sword or shield? An overview and competitive analysis of the marketing of "authorized generics".
Zain S
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(4):739-77. PubMed ID: 18557229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bib Pharma Monopoly: Why Consumers Keep Landing on "Park Place" and How the Game is Rigged.
Levy MS
Am Univ Law Rev; 2016; 66(1):247-303. PubMed ID: 28225582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The ongoing regulation of generic drugs.
Frank RG
N Engl J Med; 2007 Nov; 357(20):1993-6. PubMed ID: 18003956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Noerr-Pennington immunity still a viable defense against antitrust claims arising from Hatch-Waxman litigation?
Steinhauer EH
Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(4):679-700. PubMed ID: 17180769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
