These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17313346)

  • 1. Branched EMG electrodes for stable and selective recording of single motor unit potentials in humans.
    Christova L; Stephanova D; Kossev A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 17313346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-invasive assessment of motor unit properties with linear electrode arrays.
    Merletti R; Farina D; Granata A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1999; 50():293-300. PubMed ID: 10689474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential.
    Barkhaus PE; Periquet MI; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selectivity of spatial filters for surface EMG detection from the tibialis anterior muscle.
    Farina D; Arendt-Nielsen L; Merletti R; Indino B; Graven-Nielsen T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Mar; 50(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12669992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals.
    Gazzoni M; Farina D; Merletti R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul; 136(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 15183268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of motor unit conduction velocity from surface EMG recordings by signal-based selection of the spatial filters.
    Mesin L; Tizzani F; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1963-71. PubMed ID: 17019860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel approach for estimating muscle fiber conduction velocity by spatial and temporal filtering of surface EMG signals.
    Farina D; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Dec; 50(12):1340-51. PubMed ID: 14656063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of MUAP properties in array surface EMG recordings of the upper trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscle.
    Kallenberg LA; Preece S; Nester C; Hermens HJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e536-42. PubMed ID: 19138534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity.
    Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
    Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental analysis of accuracy in the identification of motor unit spike trains from high-density surface EMG.
    Holobar A; Minetto MA; Botter A; Negro F; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Jun; 18(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20144921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.
    Blok JH; Van Dijk JP; Zwarts MJ; Stegeman DF
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Sep; 32(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15937880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials.
    Wee AS; Ashley RA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions.
    Farina D; Pozzo M; Merlo E; Bottin A; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1383-93. PubMed ID: 15311823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Insight into the motor unit activation and structure properties gained from EMG signal analysis.
    Zalewska E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 120(3):449-50. PubMed ID: 19243991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor unit synchronous firing as revealed by determinism of surface myoelectric signal.
    Del Santo F; Gelli F; Schmied A; Vedel JP; Rossi A; Mazzocchio R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jul; 155(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16472869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for better positioning bipolar electrodes for lower limb EMG recordings during dynamic contractions.
    Sacco IC; Gomes AA; Otuzi ME; Pripas D; Onodera AN
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 May; 180(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 19427540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-dimensional spatial distribution of surface mechanomyographical response to single motor unit activity.
    Cescon C; Madeleine P; Graven-Nielsen T; Merletti R; Farina D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Jan; 159(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16876257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motor unit potentials at high muscle activity recorded by selective electrodes.
    Gydikov A; Kosarov D; Kossev A; Kostov K; Trayanova N; Radicheva N
    Biomed Biochim Acta; 1986; 45(1-2):S63-8. PubMed ID: 3964247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Passive neutralization of myoelectric interference from neural recording tripoles.
    Pachnis I; Demosthenous A; Donaldson N
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 54(6 Pt 1):1067-74. PubMed ID: 17554825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.