137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17314702)
1. The effect of Medicare's Prospective Payment System on patient satisfaction: an illustration with four rehabilitation hospitals.
Shah PK; Heinemann AW; Manheim LM
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 86(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 17314702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modifications of the FIM instrument under the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.
Granger CV; Deutsch A; Russell C; Black T; Ottenbacher KJ
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 86(11):883-92. PubMed ID: 17873825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Medicare's prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke patient outcomes.
Dobrez D; Heinemann AW; Deutsch A; Manheim L; Mallinson T
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Mar; 89(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 20068431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare's payment system: its effect on discharges to skilled nursing facilities from rehabilitation hospitals.
Chan L; Ciol M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jun; 81(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 10857511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Change in inpatient rehabilitation admissions for individuals with traumatic brain injury after implementation of the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.
Hoffman JM; Donoso Brown E; Chan L; Dikmen S; Temkin N; Bell KR
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8):1305-12. PubMed ID: 22840827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the planned substitution of the minimum data set-post acute care for use in the rehabilitation hospital prospective payment system.
Buchanan JL; Andres PL; Haley SM; Paddock SM; Zaslavsky AM
Med Care; 2004 Feb; 42(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 14734953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Organizational and market factors associated with Medicare dependence in inpatient rehabilitation hospitals.
Thompson JM; McCue MJ
Health Serv Manage Res; 2004 Feb; 17(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 15006083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the prospective payment system on speech-language pathology services.
Frymark TB; Mullen RC
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 84(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 15632484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early effects of the prospective payment system on inpatient rehabilitation hospital performance.
McCue MJ; Thompson JM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 87(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 16442972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Did the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system result in changes in relative patient severity and relative resource use?
Paddock SM; Escarce JJ; Hayden O; Buntin MB
Med Care; 2007 Feb; 45(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 17224774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential impact of the new medicare prospective payment system on reimbursement for traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation.
Hoffman JM; Doctor JN; Chan L; Whyte J; Jha A; Dikmen S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Aug; 84(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 12917856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of Medicare's payment system for rehabilitation hospitals on length of stay, charges, and total payments.
Chan L; Koepsell TD; Deyo RA; Esselman PC; Haselkorn JK; Lowery JK; Stolov WC
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(14):978-85. PubMed ID: 9309104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The early impact of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system on stroke rehabilitation case mix, practice patterns, and outcomes.
DeJong G; Horn SD; Smout RJ; Ryser DK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12 Suppl 2):S93-S100. PubMed ID: 16373144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying and accommodating statistical outliers when setting prospective payment rates for inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
Paddock SM; Wynn BO; Carter GM; Buntin MB
Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 39(6 Pt 1):1859-79. PubMed ID: 15533191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in the location of death after passage of Medicare's prospective payment system. A national study.
Sager MA; Easterling DV; Kindig DA; Anderson OW
N Engl J Med; 1989 Feb; 320(7):433-9. PubMed ID: 2643774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.
Cromwell J; Drozd EM; Gage B; Maier J; Richter E; Goldman HH
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2005 Mar; 8(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15870482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the prospective payment system: lessons learned.
Zorowitz RD
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Jun; 45(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 19532112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2012; changes in size and square footage of inpatient rehabilitation units and inpatient psychiatric units. Final rule.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Fed Regist; 2011 Aug; 76(151):47836-915. PubMed ID: 21818878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in inpatient rehabilitation stroke outcomes before and after advent of the prospective payment system: a systematic review.
Rinere O'Brien S
J Neurol Phys Ther; 2010 Mar; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 20212363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The early effect of Medicare's prospective payment system on the use of medical intensive care services in three community hospitals.
Mayer-Oakes SA; Oye RK; Leake B; Brook RH
JAMA; 1988 Dec; 260(21):3146-9. PubMed ID: 3054187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
