482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17315184)
1. Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations.
Campbell I
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3661-75. PubMed ID: 17315184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comments on 'Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations'.
Martín Andrés A
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1791-5; author reply 1795-6. PubMed ID: 18069725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Choice of test for association in small sample unordered r x c tables.
Lydersen S; Pradhan V; Senchaudhuri P; Laake P
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4328-43. PubMed ID: 17311220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tests of contingency tables.
Amiri S; Modarres R
J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):784-796. PubMed ID: 27936354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
Lydersen S; Laake P
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Categorical independence tests for large sparse r-way contingency tables.
Mielke PW; Berry KJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):606-10. PubMed ID: 12434857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 2 × 2 Tables: a note on Campbell's recommendation.
Busing FM; Weaver B; Dubois S
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1354-8. PubMed ID: 26576745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chi-Squared Test of Fit and Sample Size-A Comparison between a Random Sample Approach and a Chi-Square Value Adjustment Method.
Bergh D
J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):204-17. PubMed ID: 26075668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
Hazra A; Gogtay N
Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of Excel programs of Fisher exact probability test for medical data].
Chen QS; Wang W; Lin PX; Zhong QH; Yu SY
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 29(4):791-3. PubMed ID: 19403423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Yates's correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables.
Haviland MG
Stat Med; 1990 Apr; 9(4):363-7; discussion 369-83. PubMed ID: 2362976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conditional and Unconditional Tests (and Sample Size) Based on Multiple Comparisons for Stratified 2 × 2 Tables.
Martín Andrés A; Herranz Tejedor I; Álvarez Hernández M
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():147038. PubMed ID: 26075012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
Ludbrook J
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
Kangave D
West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
Ludbrook J
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
Osborn JF
Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accurate and efficient power calculations for 2 x m tables in unmatched case-control designs.
Bukszár J; van den Oord EJ
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2632-46. PubMed ID: 16025555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
