649 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17315221)
1. Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women.
Nager CW; Albo ME; Fitzgerald MP; McDermott S; Wruck L; Kraus S; Howden N; Norton P; Sirls L; Varner E; Zimmern P;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 17315221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women.
Nager CW; FitzGerald M; Kraus SR; Chai TC; Zyczynski H; Sirls L; Lemack GE; Lloyd LK; Litman HJ; Stoddard AM; Baker J; Steers W;
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1470-4. PubMed ID: 18295276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and demographic factors associated with valsalva leak point pressure among women undergoing burch bladder neck suspension or autologous rectus fascial sling procedures.
Lemack GE; Xu Y; Brubaker L; Nager C; Chai T; Moalli P; Kraus SR; Kerr L; Sirls L; Stoddard A;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 17304525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence.
Panayi DC; Duckett J; Digesu GA; Camarata M; Basu M; Khullar V
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 19089898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Recommendations for the urodynamic examination in the investigation of non-neurological female urinary incontinence].
Hermieu JF;
Prog Urol; 2007 Nov; 17(6 Suppl 2):1264-84. PubMed ID: 18214138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Could the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines on urodynamics in urinary incontinence put some women at risk of a bad outcome from stress incontinence surgery?
Agur W; Housami F; Drake M; Abrams P
BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(5):635-9. PubMed ID: 19021606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Albo M; Wruck L; Baker J; Brubaker L; Chai T; Dandreo KJ; Diokno A; Goode P; Kraus S; Kusek JW; Lemack G; Lowder J; Steers W;
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1810-4. PubMed ID: 17437826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence?
Serati M; Cattoni E; Siesto G; Braga A; Sorice P; Cantaluppi S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Vitobello D; Bolis P; Salvatore S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E344-50. PubMed ID: 23421421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of urethral electromyography in predicting outcome of Burch retropubic urethropexy.
Kenton K; FitzGerald MP; Shott S; Brubaker L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 11483903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The volume at which women leak first on urodynamic testing is not associated with quality of life, measures of urethral integrity or surgical failure.
Lowenstein L; Dooley Y; Kenton K; Rickey L; FitzGerald MP; Mueller E; Brubaker L
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 17499809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence.
Mitsui T; Tanaka H; Moriya K; Kakizaki H; Nonomura K
Int J Urol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1076-9. PubMed ID: 18036043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urodynamic obstruction in women with stress urinary incontinence--do nonintubated uroflowmetry and symptoms aid diagnosis?
Gravina GL; Costa AM; Galatioto GP; Ronchi P; Tubaro A; Vicentini C
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):959-63; discussion 963-4. PubMed ID: 17632142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One year follow-up on the SPARC sling system for the treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence.
Primus G
Int J Urol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 17083393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation?
Weidner AC; Myers ER; Visco AG; Cundiff GW; Bump RC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 184(2):20-7. PubMed ID: 11174474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling.
Miller EA; Amundsen CL; Toh KL; Flynn BJ; Webster GD
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2234-7. PubMed ID: 12771757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do women with pure stress urinary incontinence need urodynamics?
Digesu GA; Hendricken C; Fernando R; Khullar V
Urology; 2009 Aug; 74(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 19515404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tension-free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium-term follow-up.
Sharifiaghdas F; Mortazavi N
Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 18408389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The presence of transurethral cystometry catheter and type of stress test affect the measurement of abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
Türker P; Kilic G; Tarcan T
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Apr; 29(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 19693953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of leak point pressure study in women with incontinence.
Sinha D; Nallaswamy V; Arunkalaivanan AS
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):186-8; discussion 188. PubMed ID: 16753397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
