268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17316761)
1. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision.
Cardoza-Favarato G; Fadare O
Hum Pathol; 2007 May; 38(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 17316761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of disease extent in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Fadare O; Cardoza-Favarato G
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Feb; 12(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 18164410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease.
Tyler LN; Andrews N; Parrish RS; Hazlett LJ; Korourian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):622-4. PubMed ID: 17425396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Analysis of recurrence and its influencing factors in patients with cervical HSIL within 24 months after LEEP].
Chen LM; Liu L; Tao X; He Y; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):534-540. PubMed ID: 31461810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of Absent High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) in Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Specimens of Patients with Colposcopic Directed Biopsy-Confirmed High-Grade CIN.
Poomtavorn Y; Tanprasertkul C; Sammor A; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):849-854. PubMed ID: 30912403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a valuable method for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Fan Q; Tay SK; Shen K
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 May; 36(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 11783374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocervical glandular involvement, multicentricity, and extent of the disease are features of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Güdücü N; Sidar G; Başsüllü N; Türkmen I; Dünder I
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 23665088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing persistence or recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Malapati R; Chaparala S; Cejtin HE
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Jul; 15(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 21716049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a high incidence country.
Sangkarat S; Ruengkhachorn I; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongthiraporn W; Rattanachaiyanont M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):1035-9. PubMed ID: 24568447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of endocervical curettage during loop electrosurgical excision procedures in predicting persistent/recurrent preinvasive cervical disease.
Cuello MA; Espinosa ME; Orlandini EJ; Hwang DY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 141(3):337-343. PubMed ID: 29509961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of cervical dysplasia after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure in an inner-city population.
Fogle RH; Spann CO; Easley KA; Basil JB
J Reprod Med; 2004 Jun; 49(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 15283059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Baloglu A; Uysal D; Bezircioglu I; Bicer M; Inci A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 282(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 19940997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Cryotherapy vs Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure on Cervical Disease Recurrence Among Women With HIV and High-Grade Cervical Lesions in Kenya: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Greene SA; De Vuyst H; John-Stewart GC; Richardson BA; McGrath CJ; Marson KG; Trinh TT; Yatich N; Kiptinness C; Cagle A; Nyongesa-Malava E; Sakr SR; Mugo NR; Chung MH
JAMA; 2019 Oct; 322(16):1570-1579. PubMed ID: 31638680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.
Jing L; Dan W; Zhunan L; Ying X; Yi C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):805-812. PubMed ID: 30167855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
