These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17318208)

  • 1. Human reliability analysis: a new method to quantify errors in cataract surgery.
    Cox A; Dolan L; Macewen CJ
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):394-7. PubMed ID: 17318208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Reliability Analysis of Cataract Surgery.
    Gauba V; Tsangaris P; Tossounis C; Mitra A; McLean C; Saleh GM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 126(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 18268206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating teaching methods: validation of an evaluation tool for hydrodissection and phacoemulsification portions of cataract surgery.
    Smith RJ; McCannel CA; Gordon LK; Hollander DA; Giaconi JA; Stelzner SK; Devgan U; Bartlett J; Mondino BJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1506-1513.e4. PubMed ID: 25135543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human reliability analysis (HRA) techniques and observational clinical HRA.
    Cuschieri A; Tang B
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010; 19(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 20095892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk factors for intraoperative complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery.
    Rutar T; Porco TC; Naseri A
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 19167084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CUSUM: a dynamic tool for monitoring competency in cataract surgery performance.
    Salowi MA; Choong YF; Goh PP; Ismail M; Lim TO
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 94(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 19951939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A different approach to assess resident phacoemulsification learning curve: analysis of both completion and complication rates.
    Lee JS; Hou CH; Yang ML; Kuo JZ; Lin KK
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):683-7. PubMed ID: 18239676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Low complication rate with cataract operations carried out by registrars in ophthalmology].
    Pot MC; Stilma JS
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(10):563-8. PubMed ID: 18402323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human error, not communication and systems, underlies surgical complications.
    Fabri PJ; Zayas-Castro JL
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):557-63; discussion 563-5. PubMed ID: 18847639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of cataract surgical opportunities and complication rates in UK higher specialist training.
    Buchan JC; Cassels-Brown A
    Eye (Lond); 2008 Nov; 22(11):1425-9. PubMed ID: 18791546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modular phakoemulsification training adapted for a left-handed trainee.
    Freeman MJ; Singh J; Chell P; Barber K
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Jan; 18(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 14707962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a pre-operative scoring system for the prediction of phacoemulsification case difficulty and the selection of appropriate cases to be performed by trainees.
    Osborne SA; Severn P; Bunce CV; Fraser SG
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 6():38. PubMed ID: 17192173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing residents in phacoemulsification.
    Feldman BH; Geist CE
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1586. PubMed ID: 17678697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human error identification: an analysis of myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion.
    Montague ML; Lee MS; Hussain SS
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Oct; 130(10):1153-7. PubMed ID: 15492160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cataract surgery for junior ophthalmologists: are there enough cases?
    Aslam SA; Elliott AJ
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun; 21(6):799-801. PubMed ID: 16575411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capsule complication during cataract surgery: Background, study design, and required additional care: Swedish Capsule Rupture Study Group report 1.
    Lundström M; Behndig A; Montan P; Artzén D; Jakobsson G; Johansson B; Thorburn W; Stenevi U
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1679-87.e1. PubMed ID: 19781459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resident cataract surgery.
    Zabalza I; Royo-Dujardin L; Del Moral A; Medina M; Peralta E; Rodríguez L; Rodríguez de la Rua E
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 22305313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resident cataract surgery.
    Carifi G
    Ophthalmology; 2012 May; 119(5):1086-7; author reply 1087-8. PubMed ID: 22551607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity change in cornea and tear layer due to incision difference on cataract surgery with either manual small-incision cataract surgery or phacoemulsification.
    Sitompul R; Sancoyo GS; Hutauruk JA; Gondhowiardjo TD
    Cornea; 2008 Sep; 27 Suppl 1():S13-8. PubMed ID: 18813069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.