These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17318470)

  • 41. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
    Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Methodological principles for optimising functional MR experiments].
    Wüstenberg T; Giesel FL; Strasburger H
    Radiologe; 2005 Feb; 45(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 15690208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow.
    Sun Y; Hearshen DO; Rankin GW; Haggar AM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 1633398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A novel MRI framework for the quantification of any moment of arbitrary velocity distributions.
    Dyverfeldt P; Sigfridsson A; Knutsson H; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Mar; 65(3):725-31. PubMed ID: 21337405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Echo PIV for flow field measurements in vivo.
    Kim HB; Hertzberg JR; Shandas R
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():357-63. PubMed ID: 15133984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Vascular imaging with contrast-enhanced sonography for experimental use].
    Krix M; Kauczor HU; Delorme S
    Radiologe; 2005 Jun; 45(6):552-9. PubMed ID: 15809842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quantification of ultrasound correlation-based flow velocity mapping and edge velocity gradient measurement.
    Park DW; Kruger GH; Rubin JM; Hamilton J; Gottschalk P; Dodde RE; Shih AJ; Weitzel WF
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1815-30. PubMed ID: 24065263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measurement of systolic and diastolic arterial wall shear stress in the ascending aorta.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Patatoukas G; Pantos I; Benekos O; Katritsis D; Kelekis NL
    Phys Med; 2008 Dec; 24(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 18343178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding.
    Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Contrast agent influences MRI phase-contrast flow measurements in small vessels.
    Lagerstrand KM; Vikhoff-Baaz B; Starck G; Forssell-Aronsson E
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Jul; 64(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20572135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Quantitative perfusion imaging in magnetic resonance imaging].
    Zöllner FG; Gaa T; Zimmer F; Ong MM; Riffel P; Hausmann D; Schoenberg SO; Weis M
    Radiologe; 2016 Feb; 56(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 26796337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In-plane velocity encoding with coherent steady-state imaging.
    Grinstead J; Sinha S
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Jul; 54(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15968674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of particle image velocimetry and phase contrast MRI in a patient-specific extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection.
    Kitajima HD; Sundareswaran KS; Teisseyre TZ; Astary GW; Parks WJ; Skrinjar O; Oshinski JN; Yoganathan AP
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Aug; 130(4):041004. PubMed ID: 18601446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantifying venous flow dynamics by flow-dephased and flow-rephased functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jochimsen TH; Möller HE
    MAGMA; 2005 Nov; 18(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 16320093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Fluid studies on flow behaviour in narrowing vessels with PC-velocimetry and numerical simulations].
    Lehmpfuhl M; Hao C; Martirosian P; Schick F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Feb; 54(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 19182872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [MR urography: principles, examination techniques, indications].
    Memarsadeghi M; Riccabona M; Heinz-Peer G
    Radiologe; 2005 Oct; 45(10):915-23. PubMed ID: 15971042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow.
    Pelc NJ; Bernstein MA; Shimakawa A; Glover GH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 1790362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Subject-specific computational simulation of left ventricular flow based on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Long Q; Merrifield R; Xu XY; Kilner P; Firmin DN; G-Z Y
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 May; 222(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 18595359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy and repeatability of fourier velocity encoded M-mode and two-dimensional cine phase contrast for pulse wave velocity measurement in the descending aorta.
    Taviani V; Patterson AJ; Graves MJ; Hardy CJ; Worters P; Sutcliffe MP; Gillard JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1185-94. PubMed ID: 20432355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mapping aortic hemodynamics using 3D cine phase contrast magnetic resonance parallel imaging: evaluation of an anisotropic diffusion filter.
    Tresoldi D; Cadioli M; Ponzini R; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Morbiducci U; Rizzo G
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1621-31. PubMed ID: 23798317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.