370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17318703)
1. Quality of compressed medical images.
Shiao YH; Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Lin CH; Chuang CC
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 17318703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios ("lossy" compression) for development of national guidelines.
Koff D; Bak P; Brownrigg P; Hosseinzadeh D; Khademi A; Kiss A; Lepanto L; Michalak T; Shulman H; Volkening A
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Dec; 22(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 18931879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression.
Schreiber D
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 14603591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images.
Sung MM; Kim HJ; Yoo SK; Choi BW; Nam JE; Kim HS; Lee JH; Yoo HS
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 12297972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise content analysis in clinical digital images.
Chuang KS; Liu BJ; Huang HK; Yonekawa H; Sankaran A
Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):397-403; discussion 404-5. PubMed ID: 8190962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of irreversible JPEG compression for a clinical ultrasound practice.
Persons KR; Hangiandreou NJ; Charboneau NT; Charboneau J; James E; Douglas BR; Salmon AP; Knudsen JM; Erickson BJ
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Mar; 15(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 12134210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of irreversible compressed images in computed radiography using physical image quality measures].
Watanabe H; Tsai DY; Lee Y; Nakamura T; Miyazaki M; Kuramochi Y; Kojima K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Dec; 65(12):1618-27. PubMed ID: 20124739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images.
Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images.
Woo HS; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Hahn S; Kim B; Kim YH; Lee KH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 17715097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Qualitative JPEG 2000 compression in digital mammography - evaluation using 480 mammograms of the CDMAM phantom.
Schreiter NF; Steffen IG; Miller J; Fallenberg E; Poellinger A; Bick U; Diekmann F
Rofo; 2011 Jul; 183(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 21667423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. JPEG2000 still image coding quality.
Chen TJ; Lin SC; Lin YC; Cheng RG; Lin LH; Wu W
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):866-74. PubMed ID: 23589187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptive threshold-based block classification in medical image compression for teleradiology.
Singh S; Kumar V; Verma HK
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Jun; 37(6):811-9. PubMed ID: 17055471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Objective and quantitative study on the effect of lossy JPEG2000 compression of nuclear medicine image].
Zhou L; Su X; Kuang A; Li L; Chai L
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):1027-30, 1044. PubMed ID: 18027689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Compression of digital images in radiology - results of a consensus conference].
Loose R; Braunschweig R; Kotter E; Mildenberger P; Simmler R; Wucherer M
Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19115165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms.
Good WF; Maitz GS; Gur D
J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 7948171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression algorithms for dermatological images.
Gulkesen KH; Akman A; Yuce YK; Yilmaz E; Samur AA; Isleyen F; Cakcak DS; Alpsoy E
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Aug; 24(8):893-6. PubMed ID: 20015169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. JPEG vs. JPEG2000: benchmarking with dermatological images.
Guarneri F; Vaccaro M; Guarneri C; Cannavò SP
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 23724923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality degradation in lossy wavelet image compression.
Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Wu J; Chen SC; Hwang IM; Jan ML
J Digit Imaging; 2003 Jun; 16(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 14517721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
