373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17318703)
21. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Bajpai V; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Yoon CJ; Hahn S
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18280929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of compressed lung CT image quality using quantitative analysis.
Yamamoto S; Johkoh T; Mihara N; Umeda T; Azuma M; Nakanishi S; Narumi Y; Naito H; Nakamura H
Radiat Med; 2001; 19(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 11837585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses.
Lee H; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Park S; Seo J; Shin YG; Kim B
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4238-48. PubMed ID: 20879584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations.
Gürdal P; Hildebolt CF; Akdeniz BG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11175274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of image information on compressibility and degradation in medical image compression.
Fidler A; Skaleric U; Likar B
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2832-8. PubMed ID: 16964859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs.
Ricke J; Maass P; Lopez Hänninen E; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Stroszczynski C; Schauer W; Boskamp T; Wolf M
Invest Radiol; 1998 Aug; 33(8):456-63. PubMed ID: 9704285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. To compress or not to compress: a compressed debate.
Siegel EL; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):981-3. PubMed ID: 17411741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Using JPEG image compression to facilitate telemedicine.
Yamamoto LG
Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 13(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 7832957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Acceptable compression ratio of full-field digital mammography using JPEG 2000.
Kang BJ; Kim HS; Park CS; Choi JJ; Lee JH; Choi BG
Clin Radiol; 2011 Jul; 66(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 21450282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Novel MOS prediction models for compressed medical image quality.
Kumar B; Singh SP; Mohan A; Anand A
J Med Eng Technol; 2011; 35(3-4):161-71. PubMed ID: 21401314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Introduction to wavelet-based compression of medical images.
Schomer DF; Elekes AA; Hazle JD; Huffman JC; Thompson SK; Chui CK; Murphy WA
Radiographics; 1998; 18(2):469-81. PubMed ID: 9536490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 12424637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An evaluation of JPEG and JPEG 2000 irreversible compression algorithms applied to neurologic computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. Joint Photographic Experts Group.
Savcenko V; Erickson BJ; Persons KR; Campeau NG; Huston J; Wood CP; Schreiner SA
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):183-5. PubMed ID: 10847394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the effect of JPEG and JPEG2000 image compression on the detection of diabetic retinopathy.
Conrath J; Erginay A; Giorgi R; Lecleire-Collet A; Vicaut E; Klein JC; Gaudric A; Massin P
Eye (Lond); 2007 Apr; 21(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 16456597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Image compression in morphometry studies requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance: procedure is key with TIFFs and various JPEG compression strengths.
Tengowski MW
Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 15200165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy.
Ringl H; Schernthaner R; Sala E; El-Rabadi K; Weber M; Schima W; Herold CJ; Dixon AK
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 18641251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images.
Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission.
Kalyanpur A; Neklesa VP; Taylor CR; Daftary AR; Brink JA
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):772-9. PubMed ID: 11110942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A No-Reference Adaptive Blockiness Measure for JPEG Compressed Images.
Tang C; Wang B
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165664. PubMed ID: 27832092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
