These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17319334)

  • 1. Density danger. Women with dense breasts have a greater likelihood of cancer.
    Hobson K
    US News World Rep; 2007 Feb; 142(5):80-1. PubMed ID: 17319334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of pre-surgical breast MRI in the management of invasive breast carcinoma.
    Del Frate C; Borghese L; Cedolini C; Bestagno A; Puglisi F; Isola M; Soldano F; Bazzocchi M
    Breast; 2007 Oct; 16(5):469-81. PubMed ID: 17433681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
    Lee CH; Weinreb JC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
    Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.
    Warner E
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 19(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 18941396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer screening in women at high risk using MRI.
    Leach MO
    NMR Biomed; 2009 Jan; 22(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19086017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions.
    Morris EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):863-80, vii. PubMed ID: 17888774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses?
    Gokalp G; Topal U; Bolca N; Ercan I
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrical impedance scanning as a new breast cancer risk stratification tool for young women.
    Stojadinovic A; Nissan A; Shriver CD; Mittendorf EA; Akin MD; Dickerson V; Lenington S; Platt LD; Stavros T; Goldstein SR; Moskovitz O; Gallimidi Z; Fields SI; Yeshaya A; Allweis TM; Manassa R; Pappo I; Ginor RX; D'Agostino RB; Gur D
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 18050282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Indications of MRI in the initial local staging of early-stage breast cancer].
    Tardivon A; Athanasiou A; Ollivier L; Neuenschwander S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 May; 35(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 17446110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dynamic infrared imaging-based diagnostic process for breast cancer.
    Joro R; Lääperi AL; Dastidar P; Järvenpää R; Kuukasjärvi T; Toivonen T; Saaristo R; Soimakallio S
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):860-9. PubMed ID: 19636984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for breast cancer with MRI: recent experience from the Australian Capital Territory.
    Price J; Chen SW
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 19453531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solving diagnostic dilemmas with Multiplex IHC: early changes and prognosis in breast cancer.
    Cross MD
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2012 Jan; 44(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 22352186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current status of breast cancer screening in the world.
    Morimoto T; Nagao T; Okazaki K; Kira M; Nakagawa Y; Tangoku A
    Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18841333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Common genetic variation in the IGF-1 gene, serum IGF-I levels and breast density.
    Verheus M; McKay JD; Kaaks R; Canzian F; Biessy C; Johansson M; Grobbee DE; Peeters PH; van Gils CH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Nov; 112(1):109-22. PubMed ID: 18064566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic infrared imaging in identification of breast cancer tissue with combined image processing and frequency analysis.
    Joro R; Lääperi AL; Soimakallio S; Järvenpää R; Kuukasjärvi T; Toivonen T; Saaristo R; Dastidar P
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 18666012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A public-domain image processing tool for automated quantification of fluorescence in situ hybridisation signals.
    Konsti J; Lundin J; Jumppanen M; Lundin M; Viitanen A; Isola J
    J Clin Pathol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 17693574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.