191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17319360)
1. A comparison of implant-supported, bar- or ball-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic study of 10 edentulous patients attending a recall visit.
Lachmann S; Kimmerle-Müller E; Gehring K; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Watzek G; Weber H
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17319360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of findings around healthy implants in association with oral hygiene measures: a clinical, microbiological, and immunological follow-up in edentulous patients.
Lachmann S; Kimmerle-Müller E; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Weber H; Haas R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):686-98. PubMed ID: 17991251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of peri-implant microbiota using the polymerase chain reaction in completely edentulous patients before and after placement of implant-supported prostheses submitted to immediate load.
Devides SL; Franco AT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 16634497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and microbiologic effects of chemical versus mechanical cleansing in professional supportive implant therapy.
Strooker H; Rohn S; Van Winkelhoff AJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 9857596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept--a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 18548933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associations between peri-implant crevicular fluid volume, concentrations of crevicular inflammatory mediators, and composite IL-1A -889 and IL-1B +3954 genotype. A cross-sectional study on implant recall patients with and without clinical signs of peri-implantitis.
Lachmann S; Kimmerle-Müller E; Axmann D; Scheideler L; Weber H; Haas R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17348886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare.
Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 19418867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; Quirynen M
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 15382775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results.
Davis DM; Packer ME
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 10635189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CrossLaps and beta-glucuronidase in peri-implant and gingival crevicular fluid.
Schubert U; Kleber BM; Strietzel FP; Dörfling P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 11324213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of the normal bacterial flora in peri-implant sulci of partially and completely edentulous patients.
Kocar M; Seme K; Hren NI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 20657863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of intracrevicular restoration margins on peri-implant health: clinical, biochemical, and microbiologic findings around esthetic implants up to 9 years.
Giannopoulou C; Bernard JP; Buser D; Carrel A; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 12705294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
