These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17319758)

  • 1. Premolar and additional first molar extraction effects on soft tissue. Effects on high Angle Class II division 1 patients.
    Ozaki T; Ozaki S; Kuroda K
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 17319758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy.
    Scott Conley R; Jernigan C
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16448270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re: vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions.
    Sivakumar A; Valiathan A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):vi; author reply vi. PubMed ID: 16808587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
    Lin PT; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions.
    Al-Nimri KS
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jan; 76(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 16448269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson G; Carvalho PE; Cançado RH; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17628247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A retrospective study of morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
    Li Q; Zheng Z; Bai D; Pang G
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 17(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 12539381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Leon-Salazar V; Leon-Salazar R; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 19651339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft-tissue changes in Class II malocclusion patients treated with extractions: a systematic review.
    Janson G; Mendes LM; Junqueira CH; Garib DG
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):631-637. PubMed ID: 26620831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips.
    Wholley CJ; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 12940559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of premolar extractions on Bolton overall ratios and tooth-size discrepancies in a Japanese orthodontic population.
    Endo T; Ishida K; Shundo I; Sakaeda K; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 20362911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extractions in adult females.
    Kachiwala VA; Kalha AS; Machado G
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19634460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Lenza EB; Francisco R; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Garib D; Lenza MA
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 29199373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment.
    Tadic N; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 17685775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Indications and limits on the choice of extraction of l4-24 and 35-45 in treating Angle class-II malocclusion by a Tweed-Merrifield analysis of the total space].
    Jegou I
    Orthod Fr; 1984; 55(2):485-94. PubMed ID: 6599559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.