These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17319762)

  • 21. Effect of cervical headgear wear on dynamic measurement of head position.
    Usumez S; Orhan M; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 16093258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with slow and rapid maxillary expansion.
    Lima Filho RM; Ruellas AC
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):870-4. PubMed ID: 17685770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term soft-tissue response to orthodontic treatment with early cervical headgear--a randomized study.
    Virkkula T; Kantomaa T; Julku J; Pirttiniemi P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):586-96. PubMed ID: 19409341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical headgear treatment and growth patterns: analysis by lateral cephalometry.
    Godt A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of cervical posture following palatal expansion: a 12-month follow-up controlled study.
    Tecco S; Caputi S; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 16957058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A longitudinal evaluation of the skeletal profile of treated and untreated skeletal Class II individuals.
    Ramos DS; de Lima EM
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15747815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
    Ulger G; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Isik F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Treatment effects of the bionator and high-pull facebow combination followed by fixed appliances in patients with increased vertical dimensions.
    Freeman CS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Graff TW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 17276859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear.
    Lima Filho RM; Lima AL; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12725376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of cervical headgear and edgewise appliances on growing patients.
    Schiavon Gandini MR; Gandini LG; Da Rosa Martins JC; Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):531-8; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 11343026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arches and cervical headgear on dentofacial structures.
    Altug-Atac AT; Erdem D
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16923782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Soft tissue profile after distal molar movement with a pendulum K-loop appliance versus cervical headgear.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Güngör-Acar A; Kircelli BH
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 18251595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stepwise advancement versus maximum jumping with headgear activator.
    Wey MC; Bendeus M; Peng L; Hägg U; Rabie AB; Robinson W
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 29(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 17556729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.