These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

666 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17320670)

  • 1. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
    Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
    Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
    Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
    Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Anderson JK; Murdock A; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y
    Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 16140077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
    Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Brown JA; Garlitz C; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Diamond SM; Strup SE
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15082005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
    Dahl DM; He W; Lazarus R; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1253-6. PubMed ID: 17141845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
    Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
    Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Janoff DM; Parra RO
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Phinthusophon K; Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukij T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Dec; 90(12):2644-50. PubMed ID: 18386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postoperative inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Abe T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Sazawa A; Suzuki S; Kawarada Y; Nonomura K
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):326-9. PubMed ID: 17275071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
    Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
    Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
    Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reality or dream?].
    Fornara P; Zacharias M
    Aktuelle Urol; 2004 Sep; 35(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 15368129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.