671 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17320670)
1. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Anderson JK; Murdock A; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y
Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 16140077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Brown JA; Garlitz C; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Diamond SM; Strup SE
Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 15082005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
Dahl DM; He W; Lazarus R; McDougal WS; Wu CL
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1253-6. PubMed ID: 17141845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus extraperitoneal endoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Phinthusophon K; Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukij T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Dec; 90(12):2644-50. PubMed ID: 18386715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postoperative inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Abe T; Shinohara N; Harabayashi T; Sazawa A; Suzuki S; Kawarada Y; Nonomura K
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):326-9. PubMed ID: 17275071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reality or dream?].
Fornara P; Zacharias M
Aktuelle Urol; 2004 Sep; 35(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 15368129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
