686 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17320671)
1. Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence?
Thiel DD; Young PR; Broderick GA; Heckman MG; Wehle MJ; Igel TC; Petrou SP
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):315-9. PubMed ID: 17320671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Voiding patterns in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence: urodynamic and demographic analysis.
Gomha MA; Boone TB
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1766-9. PubMed ID: 12686829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings.
Ficazzola MA; Nitti VW
J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1317-20. PubMed ID: 9751344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-stage management of severe postprostatectomy bladder neck contracture associated with stress incontinence.
Gousse AE; Tunuguntla HS; Leboeuf L
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):316-9. PubMed ID: 15708045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Can preoperative urodynamic examination allow us to predict the risk of incontinence after radical prostatectomy?].
Golomb J; Dotan Z; Leibovitch I; Mor Y; Ramon J
Prog Urol; 1999 Apr; 9(2):288-91. PubMed ID: 10370953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Selli C; De Antoni P; Moro U; Macchiarella A; Giannarini G; Crisci A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 15204424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Artificial sphincter in severe urinary incontinence: 9 years of experience].
Batista Miranda JE; Arañó Bertrán P; Errando Smet C
Arch Esp Urol; 2000 Jun; 53(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 10961004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results.
Gousse AE; Madjar S; Lambert MM; Fishman IJ
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1755-8. PubMed ID: 11586217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Urodynamics of urinary incontinence post radical prostatectomy].
Salinas Casado J; Virseda Chamorro M; Fernández Ajubita H; Ramírez Fernández JC; Fuentes Márquez I; Resel Estévez L
Arch Esp Urol; 1998 Oct; 51(8):801-10. PubMed ID: 9859586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of radical prostatectomy on patient well-being: a prospective urodynamic study focused on detrusor function.
Natsume O; Kondo H; Cho M; Fujimoto K; Ozono S; Hirao Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2004 Jan; 50(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15032007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence.
Imamoglu MA; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H; Yiğitbasi O; Kiper A
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 15661416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: mean followup of 18 months.
Castle EP; Andrews PE; Itano N; Novicki DE; Swanson SK; Ferrigni RG
J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1657-60. PubMed ID: 15821530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive Factors of De Novo Overactive Bladder After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Men With Postprostatectomy Incontinence.
Ko KJ; Lee CU; Kim TH; Suh YS; Lee KS
Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():215-219. PubMed ID: 29030076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can filling phase urodynamic parameters predict the success of the bulbar artificial urinary sphincter in treating post-prostatectomy incontinence?
Solomon E; Veeratterapillay R; Malde S; Harding C; Greenwell TJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Aug; 36(6):1557-1563. PubMed ID: 27673430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical and neuro-urodynamic assessment of radical prostatectomy].
González-Chamorro F; Verdú Tartajo F; Durán Merino R; Lledo García E; Moncada Iribarren I; Diez Cordero JM; Herranz Amo F; Bueno Chomón G; Hernández Fernández C
Arch Esp Urol; 1996 Mar; 49(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 8702322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of urodynamic studies in the framework of total radical prostatectomy].
Marotta J; Lavianne P; Marievoet C
Acta Urol Belg; 1995 Mar; 63(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 7725990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of radical prostatectomy on sensory threshold and pressure transmission.
John H; Sullivan MP; Bangerter U; Hauri D; Yalla SV
J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1761-6. PubMed ID: 10799177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: contemporary outcomes.
Ward JF; Sebo TJ; Blute ML; Zincke H
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1156-60. PubMed ID: 15758726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continence and quality of life assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
Gnessin E; Livne PM; Baniel J; Gillon G
Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):592-4. PubMed ID: 15473584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup.
Haab F; Trockman BA; Zimmern PE; Leach GE
J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 9224318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
