BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1732108)

  • 1. Rational approach to the quantification of genotoxicity.
    Benigni R
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1992; 19(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 1732108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships between in vitro mutagenicity assays.
    Benigni R
    Mutagenesis; 1992 Sep; 7(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 1470028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interrelationships among carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, acute toxicity, and chemical structure in a genotoxicity data base.
    Benigni R; Andreoli C; Giuliani A
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1989; 27(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 2724362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which rules for assembling short-term test batteries to predict carcinogenicity?
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Mol Toxicol; 1987; 1(2-3):143-66. PubMed ID: 3449755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the National Toxicology Program data on in vitro genetic toxicity tests using multivariate statistical methods.
    Benigni R
    Mutagenesis; 1989 Nov; 4(6):412-9. PubMed ID: 2695754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A decision tree-based integrated testing strategy for tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test substances using genotoxicity test results and chemical spaces.
    Fujita Y; Honda H; Yamane M; Morita T; Matsuda T; Morita O
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30551173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comment on the US EPA recommendation for genotoxicity guidelines on chemicals.
    Ishidate M
    Mutat Res; 1992 Aug; 272(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1380121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data selection and treatment of chemicals tested for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
    Loprieno N; Boncristiani G; Loprieno G; Tesoro M
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():121-6. PubMed ID: 1820253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.
    Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 854-855():503199. PubMed ID: 32660827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An integrative test strategy for cancer hazard identification.
    Luijten M; Olthof ED; Hakkert BC; Rorije E; van der Laan JW; Woutersen RA; van Benthem J
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 46(7):615-39. PubMed ID: 27142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic toxicology: can we design predictive in vivo assays?
    Clive D
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):313-30. PubMed ID: 3285193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What indication is common to different genotoxicity data bases?
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Mutat Res; 1991 Oct; 253(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 1922137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
    Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of gastrointestinal drugs.
    Brambilla G; Mattioli F; Martelli A
    Mutagenesis; 2010 Jul; 25(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 20478972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of genotoxicity assays in the regulation of chemicals in The Netherlands: considerations and experiences.
    Kramers PG; Knaap AG; van der Heijden CA; Taalman RD; Mohn GR
    Mutagenesis; 1991 Nov; 6(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 1800896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying genotoxicity and non-genotoxicity.
    Rosenkranz HS; Ennever FK
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):59-67. PubMed ID: 3285198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Studies on the potential for genotoxic carcinogenicity of fragrances and other chemicals.
    Rosenkranz HS; Zhang YP; Klopman G
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):687-96. PubMed ID: 9734719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.