These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17321219)

  • 1. Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rules.
    Guimaraes P; Palesch Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 17321219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of the triangular test with response-adaptive treatment allocation.
    Coad DS; Ivanova A
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1483-93. PubMed ID: 15706635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blinded assessment of treatment effects utilizing information about the randomization block length.
    Miller F; Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(12):1690-706. PubMed ID: 19340815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
    Villar J; Carroli G
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.
    Pickering RM; Weatherall M
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5445-56. PubMed ID: 17924360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stratified and randomized play-the-winner rule.
    Liang Y; Carriere KC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):581-93. PubMed ID: 18375460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
    Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1305-15. PubMed ID: 12687656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Composite outcomes in randomized clinical trials: arguments for and against.
    Ross S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):119.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17306647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of continuous versus dichotomous outcome variables on study power when sample sizes of orthopaedic randomized trials are small.
    Bhandari M; Lochner H; Tornetta P
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Mar; 122(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 11880910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study.
    Fenwick J; Needleman IG; Moles DR
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-82. PubMed ID: 18840153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Balancing statistical and ethical considerations in planning clinical trials: recommendations for response-adaptive randomization urn designs.
    Piccorelli AV; Fraker SA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1105-1118. PubMed ID: 29442610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MSurvPow: a FORTRAN program to calculate the sample size and power for cluster-randomized clinical trials with survival outcomes.
    Gao F; Manatunga AK; Chen S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Apr; 78(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 15780890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation.
    Devane D; Begley CM; Clarke M
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Aug; 47(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15238124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the estimation of change from baseline in a continuous outcome measure in the clinical trial setting.
    Mayer-Hamblett N; Kronmal RA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 15837448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size determination for comparing several survival curves with unequal allocations.
    Halabi S; Singh B
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1793-815. PubMed ID: 15160409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.