236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17322039)
1. Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.
Charles D
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5815):1069. PubMed ID: 17322039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Agbiotech. USDA decides against new regulation of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6017):523. PubMed ID: 21292947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Courts upbraid USDA for 'lax review' of GM crops.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Nov; 27(11):970. PubMed ID: 19898439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US courts thwart GM alfalfa and turf grass.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 25(4):367-8. PubMed ID: 17420729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. National academy panel urges USDA to toughen reviews of transgenic plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 11923822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
Gurian-Sherman D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
Reardon S
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharming in crop commodities.
Stewart CN
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1222-3. PubMed ID: 18997756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Drugs in crops (continued).
Phillips GC
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):655-6. PubMed ID: 15175676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecology. Harvesting data from genetically engineered crops.
Marvier M; Carrière Y; Ellstrand N; Gepts P; Kareiva P; Rosi-Marshall E; Tabashnik BE; Wolfenbarger LL
Science; 2008 Apr; 320(5875):452-3. PubMed ID: 18436759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds.
Stokstad E
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):295. PubMed ID: 20395485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetically modified organisms. Experts recommend a cautious approach.
Stokstad E
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5657):449. PubMed ID: 14739429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cultivation and environmental impacts of GMO crops].
Pelletier G
J Soc Biol; 2009; 203(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 20122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. GM crop data-agronomy and ecology in tandem.
Stewart CN; Wheaton SK
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 11135511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Liberty Link rice raises specter of tightened regulations.
Vermij P
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1301-2. PubMed ID: 17093456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
