236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17322039)
21. Growing pains.
Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7356):265-6. PubMed ID: 21776037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. US reflects on flying eye for transgenic crops.
Knight J
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6954):112. PubMed ID: 12968141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
Marris E
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Verdict still out on biotech crops.
Ervin D
Science; 2010 May; 328(5982):1105-6. PubMed ID: 20508111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transgenic grass skirts regulators.
Ledford H
Nature; 2011 Jul; 475(7356):274-5. PubMed ID: 21776051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Gene-editing surges as US rethinks regulations.
Ledford H
Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7598):158-9. PubMed ID: 27075074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Transgenes and national boundaries - The need for international regulation.
Bagavathiannan M; Van Acker R
Environ Biosafety Res; 2009; 8(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 20028616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
Jayaraman KS
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.
McHughen A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):725-7. PubMed ID: 17621292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Terminator technology temporarily terminated.
Niiler E
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Nov; 17(11):1054. PubMed ID: 10545899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
Schubert D
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785-7; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.
Biotechnol J; 2007 Jun; 2(6):670. PubMed ID: 17570700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Agbiotech. Report says India needs stronger, independent regulatory body.
Bagla P
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5677):1579. PubMed ID: 15192187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective.
Kleter GA; Bhula R; Bodnaruk K; Carazo E; Felsot AS; Harris CA; Katayama A; Kuiper HA; Racke KD; Rubin B; Shevah Y; Stephenson GR; Tanaka K; Unsworth J; Wauchope RD; Wong SS
Pest Manag Sci; 2007 Nov; 63(11):1107-15. PubMed ID: 17880042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech.
Miller HI
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Brazil surpasses US in new transgenic crop plantings.
Lawrence S
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):260. PubMed ID: 18327226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Agbiotech. Can biotech and organic farmers get along?
Stokstad E
Science; 2011 Apr; 332(6026):166-7, 169. PubMed ID: 21474728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Genetically modified crops. Tracing the transatlantic spread of GM rice.
Vogel G
Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5794):1714. PubMed ID: 16990520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
