116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17322128)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of minimally invasive repairs for complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
Wellmann M; Zantop T; Weimann A; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Jun; 35(6):955-61. PubMed ID: 17322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with a flip button/polydioxanone repair for treatment of total acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
Wellmann M; Zantop T; Petersen W
Arthroscopy; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1132.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17916485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical comparison of suture constructs used for coracoclavicular fixation.
Wickham MQ; Wyland DJ; Glisson RR; Speer KP
J South Orthop Assoc; 2003; 12(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 14577722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation.
Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Chowaniec DM; Niver GE; Nowak MD; Hanypsiak BT; Guerra JJ; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2218-25. PubMed ID: 21841067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive coracoclavicular stabilization with suture anchors for acute acromioclavicular dislocation.
Choi SW; Lee TJ; Moon KH; Cho KJ; Lee SY
Am J Sports Med; 2008 May; 36(5):961-5. PubMed ID: 18272797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair.
Lorbach O; Bachelier F; Vees J; Kohn D; Pape D
Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18296541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.
Wellmann M; Kempka JP; Schanz S; Zantop T; Waizy H; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2009 May; 17(5):521-8. PubMed ID: 19225755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TightRope versus fiber mesh tape augmentation of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
Zooker CC; Parks BG; White KL; Hinton RY
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1204-8. PubMed ID: 20392969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanics of a new technique for minimal-invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
Schliemann B; Lenschow S; Schürmann P; Schroeglmann M; Herbort M; Kösters C; Raschke MJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 May; 21(5):1176-82. PubMed ID: 22552620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation methods for tibial eminence fractures.
Eggers AK; Becker C; Weimann A; Herbort M; Zantop T; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 17170161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions.
Uggen C; Wei A; Glousman RE; ElAttrache N; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Oct; 25(10):1085-92. PubMed ID: 19801286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elongation and structural properties of meniscal repair using suture techniques in distraction and shear force scenarios: biomechanical evaluation using a cyclic loading protocol.
Zantop T; Temmig K; Weimann A; Eggers AK; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
Am J Sports Med; 2006 May; 34(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 16567460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study.
Tauber M; Gordon K; Koller H; Fox M; Resch H
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 18818433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of suture material on the biomechanical behavior of suture-tendon specimens: a controlled study in bovine rotator cuff.
Bisson LJ; Manohar LM; Wilkins RD; Gurske-Deperio J; Ehrensberger MT
Am J Sports Med; 2008 May; 36(5):907-12. PubMed ID: 18359819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive coracoclavicular stabilization with suture anchors for acute acromioclavicular dislocation.
Tischer T; Imhoff AB
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):e5. PubMed ID: 19251682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.
Michlitsch MG; Adamson GJ; Pink M; Estess A; Shankwiler JA; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1196-203. PubMed ID: 20351202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of reconstruction techniques for disruption of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments.
Pearsall AW; Hollis JM; Russell GV; Stokes DA
J South Orthop Assoc; 2002; 11(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 12741581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of 3 stabilization methods on acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
Nüchtern JV; Sellenschloh K; Bishop N; Jauch S; Briem D; Hoffmann M; Lehmann W; Pueschel K; Morlock MM; Rueger JM; Großterlinden LG
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jun; 41(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 23618701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of an augmented coracoacromial ligament transfer for acromioclavicular joint instability.
Wellmann M; Lodde I; Schanz S; Zantop T; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
Arthroscopy; 2008 Dec; 24(12):1395-401. PubMed ID: 19038711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Campbell RB; Torrie A; Hecker A; Sekiya JK
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17554103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
