These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1732260)

  • 1. The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis.
    Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN; Estève P; de Roguin B
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1992 Jan; 74(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 1732260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses.
    Götze C; Vieth V; Meier N; Böttner F; Steinbeck J; Hackenberg L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Oct; 20(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 16023274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The upper end of the femur: dimensions of the endosteal canal.
    Fessy MH; Bejui J; Fischer LP; Bouchet A
    Surg Radiol Anat; 1995; 17(2):155-60, 21-3. PubMed ID: 7482154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR; Shin Y; Agrawal P; Elhabian SY; Whitaker RT; Weiss JA; Aoki SK; Peters CL; Anderson AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the morphology of the proximal femur of the Indian population towards designing more suitable THR implants.
    Maji PK; Roychowdhury A; Datta D
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 23016789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proximal femoral medullary canal diameters in Indians: correlation between anatomic, radiographic, and computed tomographic measurements.
    Sen RK; Tripathy SK; Kumar R; Kumar A; Dhatt S; Dhillon MS; Nagi ON; Gulati M
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Aug; 18(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 20808010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphological study of the newly designed cementless femoral stem.
    Baharuddin MY; Salleh ShH; Zulkifly AH; Lee MH; Mohd Noor A
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():692328. PubMed ID: 25025068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The tridimensional geometry of the proximal femur should determine the design of cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Wegrzyn J; Roux JP; Loriau C; Bonin N; Pibarot V
    Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2329-2334. PubMed ID: 29468265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal.
    Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [MORPHOLOGICAL STUDY ON PROXIMAL FEMUR IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH CROWE TYPE IV DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE].
    Liu H; Xu N; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Sun J; Tong J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 29(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 26677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A semi-automated method for measuring femoral shape to derive version and its comparison with existing methods.
    Berryman F; Pynsent P; McBryde C
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1314-25. PubMed ID: 25044860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cementless hip prosthesis design: a basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people].
    Fuku H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 68(9):763-73. PubMed ID: 7963930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques.
    Cerveri P; Marchente M; Bartels W; Corten K; Simon JP; Manzotti A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1752-66. PubMed ID: 20177779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Morphological Analysis of Sex, Age, and Symmetry of Proximal Femurs from Computed Tomography: Application to Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Sparks CA; Decker SJ; Ford JM
    Clin Anat; 2020 Jul; 33(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 31591757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur.
    Husmann O; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; de Roguin B; Argenson JN
    J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jun; 12(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 9195321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants.
    Adam F; Hammer DS; Pape D; Kohn D
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Jun; 122(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 12070644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ten-year outcomes of cementless anatomical femoral implants after 3D computed tomography planning. Follow-up note.
    Tostain O; Debuyzer E; Benad K; Putman S; Pierache A; Girard J; Pasquier G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):937-942. PubMed ID: 31255501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgically Relevant Morphological Parameters of Proximal Human Femur: A Statistical Analysis Based on 3D Reconstruction of CT Data.
    Soodmand E; Zheng G; Steens W; Bader R; Nolte L; Kluess D
    Orthop Surg; 2019 Feb; 11(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 30809957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.
    Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lecoz L; Flecher X; Argenson JN
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 23806349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.