These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes]. Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry. Punjabi OS; Ho HK; Kniestedt C; Bostrom AG; Stamper RL; Lin SC Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients]. Schlote T; Landenberger H Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude]. Colás-Tomás T; Prieto-Del Cura M; Villafruela-Güemes I; Clariana-Martín A; Valdivia-Pérez A Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ocular pulse amplitude at different intraocular pressure: a prospective study. Knecht PB; Bosch MM; Michels S; Mannhardt S; Schmid U; Bosch MA; Menke MN Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 89(5):e466-71. PubMed ID: 21401909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry. Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Vasilopoulos K; Skourtis G; Papadopoulos GE; Petropoulos IK Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Apr; 232(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 25902089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting ocular pulse amplitude in eyes with open angle glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect eyes. Choi J; Lee J; Park SB; Lee KS; Sung KR; Kook MS Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):552-8. PubMed ID: 20560890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Erickson DH; Goodwin D; Rollins M; Belaustegui A; Anderson C Optometry; 2009 Apr; 80(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19329059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry. Hoffmann EM; Grus FH; Pfeiffer N BMC Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 4():4. PubMed ID: 15038831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes]. Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry according to the International Ocular Tonometer Standards ISO 8612 in glaucoma patients]. Pahlitzsch M; Gonnermann J; Maier AK; Schwenteck T; Torun N; Bertelmann E; Klamann MK Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2014 Nov; 231(11):1107-13. PubMed ID: 25419668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]