BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

714 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17323311)

  • 1. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
    Chang M
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
    Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo.
    Pigeot I; Schäfer J; Röhmel J; Hauschke D
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 12627407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive design method based on sum of p-values.
    Chang M
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(14):2772-84. PubMed ID: 17133651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing non-inferiority and superiority for two endpoints for several treatments with a control.
    Lawrence J
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 20949636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal design of clinical trials comparing several treatments with a control.
    Marschner IC
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 17323312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixed approach for proving non-inferiority in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Rousson V; Seifert B
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):190-204. PubMed ID: 18311852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; Tsong Y; Cui L
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1903-12. PubMed ID: 11427948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninferiority testing beyond simple two-sample comparison.
    Tsong Y; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):289-308. PubMed ID: 17365225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size determination in clinical trials with multiple co-primary binary endpoints.
    Sozu T; Sugimoto T; Hamasaki T
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(21):2169-79. PubMed ID: 20687162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination in superiority clinical trials with multiple co-primary correlated endpoints.
    Sozu T; Sugimoto T; Hamasaki T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):650-68. PubMed ID: 21516562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blinded sample size reestimation in non-inferiority trials with binary endpoints.
    Friede T; Mitchell C; Müller-Velten G
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):903-16. PubMed ID: 17726715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-formulating non-inferiority trials as superiority trials: The case of binary outcomes.
    Durkalski VL; Berger VW
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 19197960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The assessment of non-inferiority in a gold standard design with censored, exponentially distributed endpoints.
    Mielke M; Munk A; Schacht A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5093-110. PubMed ID: 18570271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat.
    Matilde Sanchez M; Chen X
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16397861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of the efficiency of the sequential parallel design in psychiatric clinical trials.
    Tamura RN; Huang X
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 17848492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-stage sample size recalculation procedure for placebo- and active-controlled non-inferiority trials.
    Schwartz TA; Denne JS
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3396-406. PubMed ID: 16900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exact sample-size determination in testing non-inferiority under a simple crossover trial.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22232060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of time-to-event data under a two-stage survival adaptive design in clinical trials.
    Lu Q; Tse SK; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):705-19. PubMed ID: 20496201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
    Polley MY; Cheung YK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.