BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17323312)

  • 1. Optimal design of clinical trials comparing several treatments with a control.
    Marschner IC
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 17323312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and sample size when multiple endpoints are considered.
    Senn S; Bretz F
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 17674404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
    Chang M
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo.
    Pigeot I; Schäfer J; Röhmel J; Hauschke D
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 12627407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninferiority testing beyond simple two-sample comparison.
    Tsong Y; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):289-308. PubMed ID: 17365225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
    Chen K; Shan M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified Haybittle-Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials.
    Lai TL; Shih MC; Zhu G
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1149-67. PubMed ID: 16189814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiplicity and flexibility in clinical trials.
    Brannath W; Koenig F; Bauer P
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 17674349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins.
    Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A generalized concept of power helped to choose optimal endpoints in clinical trials.
    Borm GF; van der Wilt GJ; Kremer JA; Zielhuis GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 60(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 17346612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size for two-stage studies with maintenance therapy.
    Feng W; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(15):2028-41. PubMed ID: 19382105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing non-inferiority and superiority for two endpoints for several treatments with a control.
    Lawrence J
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 20949636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size formulae for trials comparing group and individual treatments in a multilevel model.
    Moerbeek M; Wong WK
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2850-64. PubMed ID: 17960589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple comparisons to both a negative and a positive control.
    Hasler M
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 22232049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active-controlled, non-inferiority trials in oncology: arbitrary limits, infeasible sample sizes and uninformative data analysis. is there another way?
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 17128427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixed noninferiority margin and statistical tests in active controlled trials.
    Tsou HH; Hsiao CF; Chow SC; Yue L; Xu Y; Lee S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):339-57. PubMed ID: 17365228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An alternative approach to assess exchangeability of a test treatment and the standard treatment with normally distributed response.
    Tsong Y; Shen M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 17365227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.