BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17324079)

  • 1. Absolute pitch: frequency-range discriminations in pigeons (Columba livia): comparisons with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Friedrich A; Zentall T; Weisman R
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17324079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-range discriminations and absolute pitch in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus), mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli), and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Lee TT; Charrier I; Bloomfield LL; Weisman RG; Sturdy CB
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 16893259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rats' (Rattus norvegicus) temporal discrimination of brief auditory stimuli: how does it compare with that of humans (Homo sapiens) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)?
    Tremblay J; Cohen J; Weisman RG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17980973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A behavior analysis of absolute pitch: sex, experience, and species.
    Weisman RG; Njegovan MG; Williams MT; Cohen JS; Sturdy CB
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):289-307. PubMed ID: 15157978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency-range discriminations: special and general abilities in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Weisman R; Njegovan M; Sturdy C; Phillmore L; Coyle J; Mewhort D
    J Comp Psychol; 1998 Sep; 112(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 9770314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using network models of absolute pitch to compare frequency-range discriminations across avian species.
    Weisman RG; Hoeschele M; Bloomfield LL; Mewhort D; Sturdy CB
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):421-7. PubMed ID: 20097276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The discrimination of temporal fine structure in call-like harmonic sounds by birds.
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ; Bartone S
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 16893261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absolute and relational control of a sequential auditory discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia).
    Murphy MS; Cook RG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 18182214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of auditory distance cues by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Radziwon KE; Welch TE; Cone JP; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3384-92. PubMed ID: 21568439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Song perception during the sensitive period of song learning in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Braaten RF; Petzoldt M; Colbath A
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 May; 120(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 16719585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Franssen effect illusion in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Dent ML; McClaine EM; Welch TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3609-14. PubMed ID: 18247768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The disassociation of visual and acoustic conspecific cues decreases discrimination by female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19685973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-fostering diminishes song discrimination in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):481-90. PubMed ID: 19130101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Species differences in the identification of acoustic stimuli by birds.
    Dent ML; Welch TE; McClaine EM; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18164143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of acoustic cue modifications on evoked vocal response to calls in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Vignal C; Mathevon N
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 May; 125(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 21341908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heterospecific discrimination of Poecile vocalizations by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Guillette LM; Hoeschele M; Hahn AH; Sturdy CB
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 Aug; 127(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 23106805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noradrenergic neurotoxin, N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine hydrochloride (DSP-4), treatment eliminates estrogenic effects on song responsiveness in female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Vyas A; Harding C; McGowan J; Snare R; Bogdan D
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 122(5):1148-57. PubMed ID: 18823170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further analysis of perception of the standard Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens): effects of length of brackets.
    Nakamura N; Watanabe S; Fujita K
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 19685970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1998 Mar; 112(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 9528113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.