98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17324322)
1. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?
Latchamsetty KC; Borden LS; Porter CR; Lacrampe M; Vaughan M; Lin E; Conti N; Wright JL; Corman JM
Can J Urol; 2007 Feb; 14(1):3429-34. PubMed ID: 17324322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Risk Group Stratification of Prostate Adenocarcinoma.
Bonebrake BT; Parr E; Huynh LM; Coutu B; Hansen N; Teply B; Enke C; Lagrange C; Baine M
Adv Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jun; 9(6):101493. PubMed ID: 38711959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades.
Surace A; Ferrarese A; Gentile V; Bindi M; Cumbo J; Solej M; Enrico S; Martino V
Open Med (Wars); 2016; 11(1):418-425. PubMed ID: 28352830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.
Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C
BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interactive training workshop to improve prostate mpMRI knowledge: results from the ESOR Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis teaching fellowship.
Barrett T; Lee KL; Illerstam F; Thomsen HS; Jhaveri KS; Løgager V
Insights Imaging; 2024 Jan; 15(1):27. PubMed ID: 38270689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reader Experience Matters.
Kang HC; Jo N; Bamashmos AS; Ahmed M; Sun J; Ward JF; Choi H
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 May; 27():53-60. PubMed ID: 33899028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomic Models of Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.
Chaddad A; Kucharczyk MJ; Cheddad A; Clarke SE; Hassan L; Ding S; Rathore S; Zhang M; Katib Y; Bahoric B; Abikhzer G; Probst S; Niazi T
Cancers (Basel); 2021 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33535569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Prostate Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): Current and Emerging Trends.
Bardis MD; Houshyar R; Chang PD; Ushinsky A; Glavis-Bloom J; Chahine C; Bui TL; Rupasinghe M; Filippi CG; Chow DS
Cancers (Basel); 2020 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 32403240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing confirmatory biopsy outcomes between MRI-targeted biopsy and standard systematic biopsy among men being enrolled in prostate cancer active surveillance.
Shapiro DD; Gregg JR; Lim AH; Nogueras-González GM; Choi H; Kang HC; Inguillo IA; Chapin BF; Davis JW; Ward JF
BJU Int; 2021 Mar; 127(3):340-348. PubMed ID: 32357283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The First In Vivo Needle-Based Optical Coherence Tomography in Human Prostate: A Safety and Feasibility Study.
Swaan A; Mannaerts CK; Muller BG; van Kollenburg RA; Lucas M; Savci-Heijink CD; van Leeuwen TG; de Reijke TM; de Bruin DM
Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Jul; 51(5):390-398. PubMed ID: 31090088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and micro-ultrasound for visualizing prostate cancer in an active surveillance population: A feasibility study.
Eure G; Fanney D; Lin J; Wodlinger B; Ghai S
Can Urol Assoc J; 2019 Mar; 13(3):E70-E77. PubMed ID: 30169149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local staging with multiparametric MRI in daily clinical practice: diagnostic accuracy and evaluation of a radiologic learning curve.
Jansen BHE; Oudshoorn FHK; Tijans AM; Yska MJ; Lont AP; Collette ERP; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Vis AN
World J Urol; 2018 Sep; 36(9):1409-1415. PubMed ID: 29680949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.
Tewes S; Peters I; Tiemeyer A; Peperhove M; Hartung D; Pertschy S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Hueper K
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2176471. PubMed ID: 29094042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.
Calio B; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Jain A; Maruf M; Xu S; Yan P; Kruecker J; Merino M; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Wood B; Pinto P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Dec; 20(4):436-441. PubMed ID: 28762373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI-fusion biopsy: the contemporary experience.
Bjurlin MA; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS
Transl Androl Urol; 2017 Jun; 6(3):483-489. PubMed ID: 28725590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From novice to expert: analyzing the learning curve for MRI-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy.
Mager R; Brandt MP; Borgmann H; Gust KM; Haferkamp A; Kurosch M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Sep; 49(9):1537-1544. PubMed ID: 28646483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of initial and tertiary centre second opinion reads of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate prior to repeat biopsy.
Hansen NL; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Warren AY; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Bratt O; Kastner C; Barrett T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2259-2266. PubMed ID: 27778089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.
Rosenkrantz AB; Verma S; Choyke P; Eberhardt SC; Eggener SE; Gaitonde K; Haider MA; Margolis DJ; Marks LS; Pinto P; Sonn GA; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 27320841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy.
Ting F; Van Leeuwen PJ; Thompson J; Shnier R; Moses D; Delprado W; Stricker PD
Prostate Cancer; 2016; 2016():3794738. PubMed ID: 27293898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer].
Herlemann A; Stief CG
Urologe A; 2016 Feb; 55(2):269-81. PubMed ID: 26831055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
