These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17325301)

  • 21. Unreliable oscillometric blood pressure measurement: prevalence, repeatability and characteristics of the phenomenon.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D; Baibas NM
    J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Dec; 23(12):794-800. PubMed ID: 19322203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Significant interarm blood pressure difference predicts cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients: CoCoNet study.
    Kim SA; Kim JY; Park JB
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(24):e3888. PubMed ID: 27310982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of the arm position on intra-arterial blood pressure measurement.
    Netea RT; Bijlstra PJ; Lenders JW; Smits P; Thien T
    J Hum Hypertens; 1998 Mar; 12(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 9579764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: which arm?
    O'Shea JC; Murphy MB
    J Hum Hypertens; 2000 Apr; 14(4):227-30. PubMed ID: 10805046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interarm blood pressure differences in the women's interagency HIV study.
    Lazar J; Holman S; Minkoff HL; Dehovitz JA; Sharma A
    AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 2008 May; 24(5):695-700. PubMed ID: 18507529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variations of blood pressure in stroke unit patients may result from alternating body positions.
    Aries MJ; Elting JW; Stewart RE; de Keyser J; Thien T; Kremer BP; Vroomen PC
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012 Aug; 21(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 21185742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blood pressure measurement method and inter-arm differences: a meta-analysis.
    Verberk WJ; Kessels AG; Thien T
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 24(11):1201-8. PubMed ID: 21776035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated device that complies with current guidelines for office blood pressure measurement: design and pilot application study of the Microlife WatchBP Office device.
    Stergiou GS; Lin CW; Lin CM; Chang SL; Protogerou AD; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou E; Tan TM
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Aug; 13(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 18635980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prevalence of interarm blood pressure difference is notably higher in women; the Viborg population-based screening program (VISP).
    Dahl M; Andersen JW; Lindholt J; Krarup NT; Borregaard B; Uberg N; Høgh A
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Jul; 24(1):1868. PubMed ID: 38997668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of forearm and upper arm blood pressures.
    Singer AJ; Kahn SR; Thode HC; Hollander JE
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 10225644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The difference in blood pressure readings between arms and survival: primary care cohort study.
    Clark CE; Taylor RS; Shore AC; Campbell JL
    BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e1327. PubMed ID: 22433975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inaccuracy in determining mean arterial pressure with oscillometric blood pressure techniques.
    Vos J; Vincent HH; Verhaar MC; Bos WJ
    Am J Hypertens; 2013 May; 26(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 23547036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Protogerou AD
    J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Nov; 22(11):796-800. PubMed ID: 18596720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.