BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17325413)

  • 1. Electrical properties of retinal-electrode interface.
    Shah S; Hines A; Zhou D; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S24-9. PubMed ID: 17325413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impedance-based retinal contact imaging as an aid for the placement of high resolution epiretinal prostheses.
    Johnson L; Scribner D; Skeath P; Klein R; Ilg D; Perkins K; Helfgott M; Sanders R; Panigrahi D
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S17-23. PubMed ID: 17325412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new approach towards a minimal invasive retina implant.
    Gerding H
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S30-7. PubMed ID: 17325414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects.
    Mahadevappa M; Weiland JD; Yanai D; Fine I; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Jun; 13(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 16003900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs.
    Majji AB; Humayun MS; Weiland JD; Suzuki S; D'Anna SA; de Juan E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):2073-81. PubMed ID: 10440263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants.
    Newbold C; Richardson R; Huang CQ; Milojevic D; Cowan R; Shepherd R
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15876642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an extraocular retinal prosthesis: evaluation of stimulation parameters in the cat.
    Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
    J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 15(8):900-6. PubMed ID: 18586497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impedance as a method to sense proximity at the electrode-retina interface.
    Ray A; Chan LL; Gonzalez A; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Dec; 19(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 21984523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulations to study spatial extent of stimulation and effect of electrode-tissue gap in subretinal implants.
    Kasi H; Bertsch A; Guyomard JL; Kolomiets B; Picaud S; Pelizzone M; Renaud P
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jul; 33(6):755-63. PubMed ID: 21354850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective electrode configuration for selective stimulation with inner eye prostheses.
    Rattay F; Resatz S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1659-64. PubMed ID: 15376514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implantation and testing of subretinal film electrodes in domestic pigs.
    Schanze T; Sachs HG; Wiesenack C; Brunner U; Sailer H
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Feb; 82(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 16125172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array.
    Wong YT; Chen SC; Seo JM; Morley JW; Lovell NH; Suaning GJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(8):825-33. PubMed ID: 19272402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transscleral implantation and neurophysiological testing of subretinal polyimide film electrodes in the domestic pig in visual prosthesis development.
    Sachs HG; Schanze T; Brunner U; Sailer H; Wiesenack C
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Mar; 2(1):S57-64. PubMed ID: 15876656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sites of neuronal excitation by epiretinal electrical stimulation.
    Schiefer MA; Grill WM
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 16562626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access resistance of stimulation electrodes as a function of electrode proximity to the retina.
    Majdi JA; Minnikanti S; Peixoto N; Agrawal A; Cohen ED
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Feb; 12(1):016006. PubMed ID: 25474329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo.
    Duan YY; Clark GM; Cowan RS
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3813-28. PubMed ID: 15020157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
    Wei XF; Grill WM
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element modeling of retinal prosthesis mechanics.
    Basinger BC; Rowley AP; Chen K; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Oct; 6(5):055006. PubMed ID: 19721183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrode-tissues interface: modeling and experimental validation.
    Sawan M; Laaziri Y; Mounaim F; Elzayat E; Corcos J; Elhilali MM
    Biomed Mater; 2007 Mar; 2(1):S7-S15. PubMed ID: 18458423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electric crosstalk impairs spatial resolution of multi-electrode arrays in retinal implants.
    Wilke RG; Moghadam GK; Lovell NH; Suaning GJ; Dokos S
    J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):046016. PubMed ID: 21673395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.