These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17325582)
1. Understanding the heart: CT and MRI for coronary heart disease. Sirineni GK; Stillman AE J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Feb; 22(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17325582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: Clinical value of different imaging methods]. Thiele H; Dörr R; Gutberlet M Herz; 2012 Dec; 37(8):887-99; quiz 900-1. PubMed ID: 23064548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is it possible for myocardial perfusion imaging to avoid missing any patients with high-risk coronary disease? Travin MI J Nucl Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 14(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 17679056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How serious a problem for myocardial perfusion assessment is moderate misregistration between SPECT and CT? Nichols KJ J Nucl Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 14(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 17386376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiovascular imaging: new directions in an evolving landscape. Dwivedi G; Chan KL; Friedrich MG; Beanlands RS Can J Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 29(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 23439017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac imaging stress techniques: How fishing in the high-tech pot. Guaricci AI; Pontone G Int J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 229():61. PubMed ID: 27884560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of combined cardiac positron emission tomography and coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. Adams GL; Trimble MA; Brosnan RB; Russo CA; Rusband D; Honeycutt EF; Shaw LK; Hurwitz LM; Turkington TG; Hanson MW; Pagnanelli RA; Borges-Neto S Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):593-8. PubMed ID: 18528180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease: the case for multiparametric imaging. Gamble JH; Scott G; Ormerod JO; Frenneaux MP Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2009 Mar; 7(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 19296768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive testing: necessary but insufficient. Douglas PS; Daubert MA Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Berman DS; Hachamovitch R; Shaw LJ; Friedman JD; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Fieno DS; Germano G; Wong ND; Kang X; Rozanski A J Nucl Med; 2006 Jul; 47(7):1107-18. PubMed ID: 16818945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualization of coronary arteries in patients after childhood Kawasaki syndrome: value of multidetector CT and MR imaging in comparison to conventional coronary catheterization. Arnold R; Ley S; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Eichhorn J; Schenk JP; Ulmer H; Kauczor HU Pediatr Radiol; 2007 Oct; 37(10):998-1006. PubMed ID: 17768616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT and MRI of coronary artery disease: established and emerging applications. de Roos A J Thorac Imaging; 2014 May; 29(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 24743856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]