These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17325921)
1. Benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: imaging findings mimicking malignancy and histopathological features. Ruiz-Delgado ML; López-Ruiz JA; Eizaguirre B; Saiz A; Astigarraga E; Fernández-Temprano Z Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 17325921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a potential diagnostic pitfall on fine needle aspiration cytology. Mathur SR; Karak K; Verma K Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 47(2):243-5. PubMed ID: 16295485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenomyoepithelial tumors of the breast: imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Adejolu M; Wu Y; Santiago L; Yang WT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):W184-90. PubMed ID: 21700984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of imaging in diagnosis of carcinoma of breast. Ahmed R; Ali SM J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 15857599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Imaging methods in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of breast cancer]. Kessler M; Milz P; Sittek H; Reiser M Bildgebung; 1995 Sep; 62(3):160-72. PubMed ID: 7496112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary breast tuberculosis masquerading as carcinoma. Madhusudhan KS; Gamanagatti S Singapore Med J; 2008 Jan; 49(1):e3-5. PubMed ID: 18204757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance findings in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: an Australian feasibility study. Peters G; Anderson J; Longman G; Thomson J; Taylor D; Bennett M; Wylie E; Goldblatt J; Chan A; Saunders C J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18373823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size. Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myoepithelial carcinoma of the breast arising in an adenomyoepithelioma: mammographic, ultrasound and histologic features. Fan F; Smith W; Wang X; Jewell W; Thomas PA; Tawfik O Breast J; 2007; 13(2):203-4. PubMed ID: 17319866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pseudo-angiomatous stromal hyperplasia presenting as a breast mass: imaging findings in three patients. Salvador R; Lirola JL; Domínguez R; López M; Risueño N Breast; 2004 Oct; 13(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 15454202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast. A case report correlating cytologic and histologic features. Hock YL; Chan SY Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(6):953-6. PubMed ID: 7992585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast imaging. Picturing the latest breast cancer detection methods. Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2006 May; 10(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16585920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Adenomyoepithelioma: Ultrasonography, Elastography, Digital Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography, and Pathology Findings of This Rare Type of Breast Tumor. Gkali CA; Chalazonitis AN; Feida E; Dimitrakakis C; Sotiropoulou M Ultrasound Q; 2015 Sep; 31(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 26366690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Second-look ultrasound: only for biopsy or more? Leung JW Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S87-9. PubMed ID: 23083617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging features of breast malignancy: breast ultrasound and MR imaging correlation. Giuliano V; Giuliano C Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 23116729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffuse pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia of the breast: a case report and a review of the radiological characteristics. Mai C; Rombaut B; Hertveldt K; Claikens B; Van Wettere P JBR-BTR; 2014; 97(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 25073236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound. Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis. Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Myoepithelial lesions of the breast: imaging characteristics and diagnosis with large-core needle biopsy in two cases. Doyle AJ; Alder SL; Rohr LR Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):787-8. PubMed ID: 7972825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]