These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17326085)

  • 1. Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion.
    Ko L; Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):639-43. PubMed ID: 17326085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bolus dispersion issues related to the quantification of perfusion MRI data.
    Calamante F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):718-22. PubMed ID: 16261569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated perfusion-weighted MRI using localized arterial input functions.
    Lorenz C; Benner T; Chen PJ; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Menezes NM; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 16969793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.
    Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):390-9. PubMed ID: 16104009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Knutsson L; Börjesson S; Larsson EM; Risberg J; Gustafson L; Passant U; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 17896379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An alternative viewpoint of the similarities and differences of SVD and FT deconvolution algorithms used for quantitative MR perfusion studies.
    Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith MR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 23(3):481-92. PubMed ID: 15862650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimising the effects of bolus dispersion in bolus-tracking MRI.
    Willats L; Connelly A; Calamante F
    NMR Biomed; 2008 Nov; 21(10):1126-37. PubMed ID: 18727165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PerfTool: a software platform for investigating bolus-tracking perfusion imaging quantification strategies.
    Kosior JC; Frayne R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):653-9. PubMed ID: 17326077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of clinical data of nonlinear stochastic deconvolution versus block-circulant singular value decomposition for quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Peruzzo D; Zanderigo F; Bertoldo A; Pillonetto G; Cosottini M; Cobelli C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Sep; 29(7):927-36. PubMed ID: 21616625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
    Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of using local arterial input functions on cerebral blood flow estimation.
    Lorenz C; Benner T; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 16767708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perfusion parameters derived from bolus-tracking perfusion imaging are immune to tracer recirculation.
    Kosior JC; Frayne R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):753-6. PubMed ID: 20187222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion MRI using independent component analysis.
    Calamante F; Mørup M; Hansen LK
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Oct; 52(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 15389944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review.
    Calamante F
    Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2013 Oct; 74():1-32. PubMed ID: 24083460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cerebral blood flow estimation in vivo using local tissue reference functions.
    Kosior JC; Smith MR; Kosior RK; Frayne R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 19097104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is correction necessary when clinically determining quantitative cerebral perfusion parameters from multi-slice dynamic susceptibility contrast MR studies?
    Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 16394347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: Improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization.
    Calamante F; Gadian DG; Connelly A
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Dec; 50(6):1237-47. PubMed ID: 14648572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: the impact of pulsatile flow on contrast agent bolus dispersion.
    Graafen D; Hamer J; Weber S; Schreiber LM
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5167-85. PubMed ID: 21775789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Cheng HL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.