These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17326376)

  • 1. A proposed benefits evaluation framework for health information systems in Canada.
    Lau F; Hagens S; Muttitt S
    Healthc Q; 2007; 10(1):112-6, 118. PubMed ID: 17326376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending the infoway benefits evaluation framework for health information systems.
    Lau F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 143():406-13. PubMed ID: 19380969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the impact of a service-oriented framework for healthcare interoperability.
    Daskalakis S; Mantas J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():285-90. PubMed ID: 18487745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A framework for evaluation of medical information systems.
    Turunen P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():611-6. PubMed ID: 14664055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the functionality of the DeLone and McLean information system success model as a framework for synthesis in nursing information and communication technology research.
    Booth RG
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Jun; 30(6):330-45. PubMed ID: 22411411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. eDoc evaluation - at eighteen months into the challenge.
    Stansfield K; Yetman L; Renwick C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 143():414-8. PubMed ID: 19380970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining a framework for health information technology evaluation.
    Eisenstein EL; Juzwishin D; Kushniruk AW; Nahm M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 164():94-9. PubMed ID: 21335694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Findings from evaluations of the benefits of diagnostic imaging systems.
    Hagens S; Kraetschmer N; Savege C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 143():136-41. PubMed ID: 19380927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit).
    Yusof MM; Kuljis J; Papazafeiropoulou A; Stergioulas LK
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jun; 77(6):386-98. PubMed ID: 17964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for the evaluation of allied health education.
    Gladhart SC; Christensen MG
    J Allied Health; 1978; 7(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 10237918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation methodology for a medical e-education patient-oriented information system.
    Curé O
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2003 Mar; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12851053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation criteria for district health management information systems: lessons from the Ministry of Health, Kenya.
    Odhiambo-Otieno GW
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Jan; 74(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15626634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. User acceptance of clinical information systems: a methodological approach to identify the key dimensions allowing a reliable evaluation framework.
    Despont-Gros C; Fabry P; Muller H; Geissbuhler A; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1038-42. PubMed ID: 15360970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution of a national approach to evaluating the benefits of the electronic health record.
    Hagens S; Krose A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 143():389-94. PubMed ID: 19380966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A framework for systematic evaluation of health information infrastructure progress in communities.
    Labkoff SE; Yasnoff WA
    J Biomed Inform; 2007 Apr; 40(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 16530489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evaluation criteria of internet health information.
    Kang NM; Kim S; Hong S; Ryu S; Chang HJ; Kim J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():886. PubMed ID: 17102445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical classification systems in Canada: moving toward the year 2000.
    Lalonde AN; Taylor E
    CMAJ; 1997 Dec; 157(11):1561-5. PubMed ID: 9400413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcome measures in clinical information systems evaluation.
    Roderer NK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1096-100. PubMed ID: 15360982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Achieving standardization of health information in Canada by the year 2000.
    Fitzgerald C; Ogilvie L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():425-8. PubMed ID: 10384492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.