These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17327204)

  • 1. Sexual reproduction prevails in a world of structured resources in short supply.
    Scheu S; Drossel B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1614):1225-31. PubMed ID: 17327204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Existence of two sexual races in the planarian species switching between asexual and sexual reproduction.
    Kobayashi K; Maezawa T; Nakagawa H; Hoshi M
    Zoolog Sci; 2012 Apr; 29(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 22468837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive plasticity in the gametocyte conversion rate of malaria parasites.
    Schneider P; Greischar MA; Birget PLG; Repton C; Mideo N; Reece SE
    PLoS Pathog; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1007371. PubMed ID: 30427935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The coevolution of parasites with host-acquired immunity and the evolution of sex.
    Lythgoe KA
    Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1142-56. PubMed ID: 11005284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Migration load and the coexistence of ecologically similar sexuals and asexuals.
    Spitzer BW; Haygood R
    Am Nat; 2007 Oct; 170(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 17891735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.
    MacCarthy T; Bergman A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(31):12801-6. PubMed ID: 17646644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dynamic coexistence of sexual and asexual invasion fronts in a system of integro-difference equations.
    Carrillo C; Cherednichenko K; Britton N; Mogie M
    Bull Math Biol; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1612-25. PubMed ID: 19387743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ecological advantage of sexual reproduction in multicellular long-lived organisms.
    Song Y; Scheu S; Drossel B
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Mar; 25(3):556-65. PubMed ID: 22268809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the avoidance of sexual costs increase fitness in asexual invaders?
    Stelzer CP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jul; 112(29):8851-8. PubMed ID: 26195736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rate of adaptation in sexuals and asexuals: a solvable model of the Fisher-Muller effect.
    Park SC; Krug J
    Genetics; 2013 Nov; 195(3):941-55. PubMed ID: 23979572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How populations persist when asexuality requires sex: the spatial dynamics of coping with sperm parasites.
    Kokko H; Heubel KU; Rankin DJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Apr; 275(1636):817-25. PubMed ID: 18182369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental challenges improve resource utilization for asexual reproduction and maintenance in hydra.
    Schaible R; Ringelhan F; Kramer BH; Miethe T
    Exp Gerontol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):794-802. PubMed ID: 21763414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Female sperm limitation in natural populations of a sexual/asexual mating complex (Poecilia latipinna, Poecilia formosa).
    Riesch R; Schlupp I; Plath M
    Biol Lett; 2008 Jun; 4(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 18319207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging asexual lineages and the evolutionary maintenance of sex.
    Ho EKH; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2017 Jul; 71(7):1865-1875. PubMed ID: 28444897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic analysis of two distinct reproductive strategies in sexual and asexual field populations of an endoparasitic wasp, Venturia canescens.
    Li D; Zhao Z; Roberts H; Schneider MV; Theopold U; Schmidt O
    Heredity (Edinb); 2003 Apr; 90(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12692581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diversification in sexual and asexual organisms.
    Barraclough TG; Birky CW; Burt A
    Evolution; 2003 Sep; 57(9):2166-72. PubMed ID: 14575336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fundamental and realized feeding niche breadths of sexual and asexual stick insects.
    Larose C; Parker DJ; Schwander T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Nov; 285(1892):. PubMed ID: 30487310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Range expansions of sexual versus asexual organisms: Effects of reproductive assurance and migration load.
    Satow T; Takimoto G
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Apr; 36(4):698-708. PubMed ID: 36852738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of spatial structure on the maintenance of sexual reproduction.
    Ament I; Scheu S; Drossel B
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):520-8. PubMed ID: 18640129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual versus Asexual Reproduction: Distinct Outcomes in Relative Abundance of Parthenogenetic Mealybugs following Recent Colonization.
    Tabata J; Ichiki RT; Tanaka H; Kageyama D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156587. PubMed ID: 27322381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.