BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1956 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17327241)

  • 1. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian decision sequential analysis with survival endpoint in phase II clinical trials.
    Zhao L; Woodworth G
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1339-52. PubMed ID: 19226557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
    Dong G; Shih WJ; Moore D; Quan H; Marcella S
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2055-67. PubMed ID: 22415966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups.
    Kikuchi T; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Aug; 20(4):389-400. PubMed ID: 20223784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequentist evaluation of group sequential clinical trial designs.
    Emerson SS; Kittelson JM; Gillen DL
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5047-80. PubMed ID: 17573678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
    Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring.
    Johnson VE; Cook JD
    Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19528131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size determination for phase II clinical trials based on Bayesian decision theory.
    Stallard N
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):279-94. PubMed ID: 9544522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A decision rule for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a primary and supportive outcome.
    Zhao Y; Grambsch PM; Neaton JD
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 17456513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hybrid Bayesian-frequentist approach to evaluate clinical trial designs for tests of superiority and non-inferiority.
    Shao Y; Mukhi V; Goldberg JD
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):504-19. PubMed ID: 17854052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods.
    Willan A; Kowgier M
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 18697843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Lee T; Kim K; George SL
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 14755389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approaches for optimal sequential decision analysis in clinical trials.
    Carlin BP; Kadane JB; Gelfand AE
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):964-75. PubMed ID: 9750245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A practical guide to Bayesian group sequential designs.
    Gsponer T; Gerber F; Bornkamp B; Ohlssen D; Vandemeulebroecke M; Schmidli H
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 24038922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The choice of sample size: a mixed Bayesian / frequentist approach.
    Pezeshk H; Nematollahi N; Maroufy V; Gittins J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Apr; 18(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 18445695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs.
    Stallard N; Todd S; Ryan EG; Gates S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31910813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal spending functions for asymmetric group sequential designs.
    Anderson KM
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 17623339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal choice of the number of treatments to be included in a clinical trial.
    Stallard N; Posch M; Friede T; Koenig F; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1321-38. PubMed ID: 19243083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 98.