These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17328138)

  • 1. Back surgery: to have or not to have. Indecision is understandable, even a good idea, in light of inconclusive research results and lack of clear physical indicators.
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 Feb; 32(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 17328138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low Back Pain Caused by Superior Cluneal Nerve Entrapment Neuropathy in Patients with Parkinson Disease.
    Iwamoto N; Isu T; Kim K; Chiba Y; Kokubo R; Morimoto D; Shirai S; Yamazaki K; Isobe M
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Mar; 87():250-4. PubMed ID: 26700750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retropsoas iliac artery: potential cause of complications in lumbar spine surgery.
    Kogias E; Sircar R; Klingler JH; Deininger MH; Hubbe U
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Aug; 15(2):210. PubMed ID: 21513427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Discogenic low back pain and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - how appropriate is surgical treatment?].
    Mayer HM
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 11793155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low back pain with progressive weakness: a case of cauda equina syndrome from lumbar disc herniation.
    Spickard A; Engel JZ
    Tenn Med; 1996 Sep; 89(9):338-9. PubMed ID: 8810869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dural pain.
    Lancet; 1978 May; 1(8073):1090-2. PubMed ID: 77380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unilateral removal of pars interarticularis.
    Tender GC; Baratta RV; Voorhies RM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Mar; 2(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 15796352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrodiagnostic testing before surgery for spinal stenosis.
    Cheng I; Ho S; Kennedy DJ
    PM R; 2014 Oct; 6(10):945-50. PubMed ID: 25441719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
    Robaina-Padrón FJ
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [If it becomes too narrow for the spinal cord--plea for a joint venture].
    Rompe JD; Pfeil J
    Orthopade; 2003 Oct; 32(10):847. PubMed ID: 14579014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis over 10 years.
    Chang Y; Singer DE; Wu YA; Keller RB; Atlas SJ
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 May; 53(5):785-92. PubMed ID: 15877553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous laser disc decompression in spinal stenosis.
    Choy DS; Ngeow J
    J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1998 Apr; 16(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 9663104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
    Mekhail N; Costandi S; Abraham B; Samuel SW
    Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of prognostic predictors of percutaneous adhesiolysis using a Racz catheter for post lumbar surgery syndrome or spinal stenosis.
    Choi E; Nahm FS; Lee PB
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(5):E531-6. PubMed ID: 24077203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lumbar spinal stenosis: which predictive factors of favorable functional results after decompressive laminectomy?
    Foulongne E; Derrey S; Ould Slimane M; Levèque S; Tobenas AC; Dujardin F; Fréger P; Chassagne P; Proust F
    Neurochirurgie; 2013 Feb; 59(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23246374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Factors determining results of surgical treatment for lumbar spine pain syndromes].
    Kiwerski J
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 1996; 61(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 8925681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.