BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17328164)

  • 1. Nanomaterials meet increased scrutiny.
    Christen K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(3):671-2. PubMed ID: 17328164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials.
    Klaine SJ; Koelmans AA; Horne N; Carley S; Handy RD; Kapustka L; Nowack B; von der Kammer F
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2012 Jan; 31(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22162122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moving beyond mass: the unmet need to consider dose metrics in environmental nanotoxicology studies.
    Hull M; Kennedy AJ; Detzel C; Vikesland P; Chappell MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(20):10881-2. PubMed ID: 23030824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials.
    Wiesner MR; Lowry GV; Alvarez P; Dionysiou D; Biswas P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jul; 40(14):4336-45. PubMed ID: 16903268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NANOtechnology: untold promise, unknown risk.
    Consum Rep; 2007 Jul; 72(7):40-5. PubMed ID: 17632953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MTBE: A poster child for exposure assessment as central to effective TSCA reform.
    Goldstein BD
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2010 May; 20(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 20407449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Broadening the global reach of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is vital to combating globalized environmental problems.
    Guo LC; Zeng EY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(18):6911-3. PubMed ID: 20795666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices.
    Bouwmeester H; Lynch I; Marvin HJ; Dawson KA; Berges M; Braguer D; Byrne HJ; Casey A; Chambers G; Clift MJ; Elia G; Fernandes TF; Fjellsbø LB; Hatto P; Juillerat L; Klein C; Kreyling WG; Nickel C; Riediker M; Stone V
    Nanotoxicology; 2011 Mar; 5(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21417684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulating mercury: what's at stake?
    Gayer T; Hahn RW
    Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):244-5. PubMed ID: 16002599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nanotechnology applications and implications research supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency STAR grants program.
    Savage N; Thomas TA; Duncan JS
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Oct; 9(10):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17909637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. EPA to revisit asbestos toxicity.
    Renner R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):1808-9. PubMed ID: 17410766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public concern over ecotoxicology risks from nanomaterials: pressing need for research-based information.
    Lapresta-Fernández A; Fernández A; Blasco J
    Environ Int; 2012 Feb; 39(1):148-9. PubMed ID: 22208755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials.
    Colvin VL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):1166-70. PubMed ID: 14520401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment.
    Verdonck F; Janssen C; Thas O; Jaworska J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 15954257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nanomaterials and the environment: uses, methods and measurement.
    Carl Englert B
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1154-61. PubMed ID: 17968441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of a multidisciplinary approach to solve complex nano EHS problems by the UC Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology.
    Xia T; Malasarn D; Lin S; Ji Z; Zhang H; Miller RJ; Keller AA; Nisbet RM; Harthorn BH; Godwin HA; Lenihan HS; Liu R; Gardea-Torresdey J; Cohen Y; Mädler L; Holden PA; Zink JI; Nel AE
    Small; 2013 May; 9(9-10):1428-43. PubMed ID: 23027589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US panel split on endocrine disruptors..
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6705):828. PubMed ID: 9804404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Debate over pollution.
    Essenhigh RH
    Am Sci; 1973; 61(1):8-9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 17715472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the city safe?
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7063):1207-8. PubMed ID: 16251908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.