These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17328376)

  • 1. Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.
    Kiesel A; Kunde W; Hoffmann J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):800-6. PubMed ID: 17328376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict.
    Kunde W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 12747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A task-difficulty artifact in subliminal priming.
    Pratte MS; Rouder JN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1276-83. PubMed ID: 19633343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception.
    Wittfoth M; Buck D; Fahle M; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):921-9. PubMed ID: 16677831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming?
    Nieuwenhuis S; Stins JF; Posthuma D; Polderman TJ; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1260-72. PubMed ID: 17225507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching.
    Hsieh S; Liu H
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1203():116-25. PubMed ID: 18314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 25822920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does response interference depend on the subjective visibility of flanker distractors?
    Maniscalco B; Bang JW; Iravani L; Camps-Febrer F; Lau H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):841-51. PubMed ID: 22477057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect.
    Wühr P; Ansorge U
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):705-31. PubMed ID: 16104103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Context-sensitive adjustments of cognitive control: conflict-adaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task.
    Fischer R; Dreisbach G; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):712-8. PubMed ID: 18444768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inverse target- and cue-priming effects of masked stimuli.
    Mattler U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 17311481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kunde W; Kiesel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1576-94. PubMed ID: 20718574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks.
    Kunde W; Wühr P
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):356-67. PubMed ID: 16752599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple systems for cognitive control: evidence from a hybrid prime-Simon task.
    Schlaghecken F; Refaat M; Maylor EA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1542-53. PubMed ID: 21728456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Kiesel A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 23743343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.