These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17328377)

  • 21. The emergence of flexible spatial strategies in young children.
    Waismeyer AS; Jacobs LF
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Feb; 49(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 22545846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual landmark orientation by flying bats at a large-scale touch and walk screen for bats, birds and rodents.
    Winter Y; von Merten S; Kleindienst HU
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Feb; 141(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 15661311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What counts as by? Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness.
    Hund AM; Plumert JM
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 17201513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Children's preference for complexity as a function of perceived units in collative motivation.
    Alberti ET; Witryol SL
    J Genet Psychol; 1990 Mar; 151(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 2332762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Overshadowing between landmarks on the touchscreen and in arena with pigeons.
    Leising KJ; Garlick D; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 21604908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing matching ability, spatial memory, and ideational fluency in boys and girls.
    Young GD; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Oct; 79(2):1019-24. PubMed ID: 7870488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reorientation and landmark-guided search by young children: evidence for two systems.
    Lee SA; Shusterman A; Spelke ES
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):577-82. PubMed ID: 16866742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Early sex differences in spatial skill.
    Levine SC; Huttenlocher J; Taylor A; Langrock A
    Dev Psychol; 1999 Jul; 35(4):940-9. PubMed ID: 10442863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Absolute and relative perceptual codes in young children.
    Duffy J; Zivian MT; Deboran AM
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jul; 48(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 2377438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia).
    Sturz BR; Katz JS
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):90-113. PubMed ID: 19236148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of number and length cues in children's quantitative judgments.
    Lawson G; Baron J; Siegel L
    Child Dev; 1974 Sep; 45(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 4143828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sex differences in route learning by children.
    Gibbs AC; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):590-4. PubMed ID: 10483650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.
    Du Y; McMillan N; Madan CR; Spetch ML; Mou W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1857-1871. PubMed ID: 28504533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modification of young children's grouping strategies: the effects of modeling, verbalization, incentives, and age.
    Zimmerman BJ
    Child Dev; 1974 Dec; 45(4):1032-41. PubMed ID: 4143849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus alignment and age in the selection of bigger rectangles.
    Shimizu M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 2):1123-6. PubMed ID: 9017720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance demands in the selection of objects for counting.
    Towse JN; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Feb; 61(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 8812029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception precedes computation: can familiarity preferences explain apparent calculation by human babies?
    Moore DS; Cocas LA
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Jul; 42(4):666-78. PubMed ID: 16802899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Solution of an insight problem at different age levels.
    Antonietti A; Nava B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1215-8. PubMed ID: 7478880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do landmarks help or hinder women in route learning?
    Gwinn HM; Fernando S; James S; Wilson JF
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):713-8. PubMed ID: 12509164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of redundant sets of landmark information by humans (Homo sapiens) in a goal-searching task in an open field and on a computer screen.
    Sekiguchi K; Ushitani T; Sawa K
    J Comp Psychol; 2018 May; 132(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 29517247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.