210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17328380)
1. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
Halamish V; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
Rickard TC; Bajic D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does organization improve priming?
Rappold VA; Hashtroudi S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 1826727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.
Payne DG; Hembrooke HA; Anastasi JS
Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 8433647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall.
McDermott KB
Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 16752590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of recall, reproduction, and restudy on word learning: a pre-registered study.
Krishnan S; Watkins KE; Bishop DVM
BMC Psychol; 2017 Aug; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 28778213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Context effects in recall and recognition at various retention intervals.
Culross RR
Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1216-8. PubMed ID: 1501990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
