These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17328385)

  • 1. Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents.
    Clifton C; Carlson K; Frazier L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 17328385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlocal effects of prosodic boundaries.
    Carlson K; Clifton C; Frazier L
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):1014-25. PubMed ID: 19744940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of Syntactic and Rhythmic Effects on Ambiguity Resolution in Turkish: A Phoneme Restoration Study.
    Deniz ND; Fodor JD
    Lang Speech; 2020 Dec; 63(4):832-855. PubMed ID: 31868561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phrase Lengths and the Perceived Informativeness of Prosodic Cues in Turkish.
    Dinçtopal Deniz N; Fodor JD
    Lang Speech; 2017 Dec; 60(4):505-529. PubMed ID: 29216811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Dede G
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2010 Aug; 39(4):345-74. PubMed ID: 20033849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL19-25. PubMed ID: 23862901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations.
    Tree JE; Meijer PJ
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10743382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informative prosodic boundaries.
    Clifton C; Carlson K; Frazier L
    Lang Speech; 2002 Jun; 45(Pt 2):87-114. PubMed ID: 12613557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intonational Structure Influences Perception of Contrastive Vowel Length: The Case of Phrase-Final Lengthening in Tokyo Japanese.
    Steffman J; Katsuda H
    Lang Speech; 2021 Dec; 64(4):839-858. PubMed ID: 33251945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.
    Arnold JE; Kam CL; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):914-30. PubMed ID: 17723069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3373-86. PubMed ID: 19425677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intonational structure as a word-boundary cue in Tokyo Japanese.
    Warner N; Otake T; Arai T
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 1):107-31. PubMed ID: 20415004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listeners' adaptation to unreliable intonation is speaker-sensitive.
    Roettger TB; Rimland K
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104372. PubMed ID: 32615469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of compatible versus competing rhythmic grouping on errors and timing variability in speech.
    Katsika A; Shattuck-Hufnagel ; Mooshammer C; Tiede M; Goldstein L
    Lang Speech; 2014 Dec; 57(Pt 4):544-62. PubMed ID: 25536847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.
    Shukla M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 16782083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A time course of prosodic modulation in phonological inferencing: The case of Korean post-obstruent tensing.
    Kim S; Mitterer H; Cho T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202912. PubMed ID: 30148859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accounting for the listener: comparing the production of contrastive intonation in typically-developing speakers and speakers with autism.
    Kaland C; Swerts M; Krahmer E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2182-96. PubMed ID: 23967948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.