These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17328389)

  • 21. The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.
    Carrasco M; Yeshurun Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):673-92. PubMed ID: 9554103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Insights into the control of attentional set in ADHD using the attentional blink paradigm.
    Mason DJ; Humphreys GW; Kent L
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 46(12):1345-53. PubMed ID: 16313435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings?
    Folk CL; Anderson BA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Jun; 17(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 20551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons.
    Theeuwes J; De Vries GJ; Godijn R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):735-46. PubMed ID: 12956581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The prioritization of feature singletons in the change detection paradigm.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G; Heywood CA; Kentridge RW
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):134-46. PubMed ID: 19261589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Taking a closer look at visual search: Just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
    Harris AM; Jacoby O; Remington RW; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 30603988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Masked singleton effects.
    Held B; Ansorge U; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2069-86. PubMed ID: 21097852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.
    Folk CL; Remington R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):847-58. PubMed ID: 9627420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Salience, Perceptual Dimensions, and the Diversion of Attention.
    Kumar KN; Chandramouli SH; Shiffrin RM
    Am J Psychol; 2015; 128(2):253-65. PubMed ID: 26255444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
    Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 16724780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overriding auditory attentional capture.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17557587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
    Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cuing the dimension of a distractor: verbal cues of target identity also benefit same-dimension distractor singletons.
    Meeter M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 16724778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention.
    Olson IR; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1299-313. PubMed ID: 11550756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection.
    Vatterott DB; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):871-8. PubMed ID: 22696250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.